Clarification regarding Form STK-2-CERTIFICATION

38 views
Skip to first unread message

Anupma Mittal

unread,
Jul 3, 2026, 6:55:22 AMJul 3
to Gyan Gurukul - CS Divesh Goyal

Dear All,

Could you please clarify the following regarding Form STK-2?

The Statement of Accounts (STK-8) is signed by the statutory auditor of the company and is also digitally signed by the auditor in the STK-2 Form.

In such a case, can the same auditor also affix his/her DSC in the same Form STK-2 in the capacity of the practising professional certifying the e-Form?

Please confirm.


Thanks & Regards

Vinod Kumar Agarwal

unread,
Jul 3, 2026, 7:07:52 AMJul 3
to gyan-gurukul-cs-d...@googlegroups.com, Gyan Gurukul - CS Divesh Goyal
Yes, we are regularly going this

--
If you want to join our Whatsapp Group "Gyan Gurukul" for quick updates on Recent Amendments and resolution of Queries, drop message to us on our whatsapp no 8130757966 (mention your Profession, Name, City).
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Gyan Gurukul - CS Divesh Goyal" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to gyan-gurukul-cs-dive...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/gyan-gurukul-cs-divesh-goyal/fe9fecc3-dee1-4e1d-a810-a5995f5e05b4n%40googlegroups.com.

Arun Kumar Maitra

unread,
Jul 3, 2026, 11:15:30 AMJul 3
to gyan-gurukul-cs-d...@googlegroups.com, Gyan Gurukul - CS Divesh Goyal
Same PCA cannot certify STK-2 and 8 because examiner cannot be examinee also.

Ankur Sharma

unread,
Jul 3, 2026, 11:17:46 AMJul 3
to gyan-gurukul-cs-d...@googlegroups.com, Gyan Gurukul - CS Divesh Goyal
There is no restriction we are doing this regularly and forms are approving without any objection relating this particular issue



Thanks & Regards
FCS Ankur Sharma
Practicing Company Secretary
Trademark Agent | Social Auditor | Independent Director
LG-15, SEC-3B, Madhav Palace, Avas Vikas
Sikandra, Agra, Uttar Pradesh-282007
Contact : 9720783389

Arun Kumar Maitra

unread,
Jul 3, 2026, 10:43:51 PMJul 3
to gyan-gurukul-cs-d...@googlegroups.com, Gyan Gurukul - CS Divesh Goyal

`As per Rule 4(1) of Companies (Removal of Names) Rules, 2016 and MCA processing norms, the practicing professional certifying STK-2 must be independent of the statutory auditor, who signed STK-8. Same DSC cannot be used for both capacities in one form. You’ll need a different CA/CS/CMA in whole-time practice to certify the e-Form STK-2, while the existing auditor’s DSC will remain on STK-8.`

The certifying CA/CS/CMA gives declaration that he has verified records and the application is correct. He can't verify his own audit.

What if you already filed with the same DSC?

ROC will likely mark it `Resubmission` with the remark: _"Professional certifying the form cannot be the same as an auditor signing STK-8. Please get it certified by an independent practicing professional."

CA CS Arun Kumar Maitra

Practicing Company Secretary


Vinod Kumar Agarwal

unread,
Jul 3, 2026, 11:03:41 PMJul 3
to gyan-gurukul-cs-d...@googlegroups.com, Gyan Gurukul - CS Divesh Goyal
I could not find any such provision in Rule 4(1) of the Companies (Removal of Names of Companies from the Register of Companies) Rules, 2016, which has gone through several amendments.

Moreover, there is also no requirement to get it certified by the Statutory Auditor of the Company

(ii) a statement of accounts in Form No. STK-8 containing assets and liabilities of the company made up to a day, not more than thirty days before the date of application and certified by a Chartered Accountant;

I have been filing STK-2 all along with the same CA certifying the STK-8 and also certifying the e-form and ROC/C-Pace has never ever raised any objection in this respect.

However there is no issue if the form is certified by different professionals.



Arun Kumar Maitra

unread,
Jul 4, 2026, 12:30:33 AMJul 4
to gyan-gurukul-cs-d...@googlegroups.com, Gyan Gurukul - CS Divesh Goyal
  • The Principle of Independence: The professional certifying the e-Form STK-2 must declare that they have verified the records and that the application is correct. In professional auditing standards, you cannot independently "verify" or audit your own work. If a CA prepares/certifies the STK-8, and then turns around and certifies the STK-2 saying "I have verified that the attached STK-8 is correct," it creates a self-review threat to independence.

  • C-PACE Strictness: Ever since the MCA established C-PACE (Centre for Processing Accelerated Corporate Exit) to centralize and speed up strike-offs, the scrutiny has become highly automated and strict. C-PACE desk officers frequently raise resubmission remarks (STK-2 defects) if the same Digital Signature Certificate (DSC) or the same professional's membership number appears as both the accountant certifying the attachments and the independent professional certifying the form.

  • To avoid a tedious Resubmission (SRN remediation) cycle, the safest and most compliant route is to split the duties:

    RoleWho Should Sign
    STK-8 (Statement of Accounts)The Company's regular Chartered Accountant / Statutory Auditor.
    e-Form STK-2 CertificationAn independent practicing CA, CS, or CMA.
  • CA CS Arun Kumar Maitra

    Practicing Company Secretary

Abhishek Sahu

unread,
Jul 4, 2026, 1:02:16 AMJul 4
to gyan-gurukul-cs-d...@googlegroups.com, Gyan Gurukul - CS Divesh Goyal
Dear Arun sir
I am regaularly seeing your remarks & advise in the group which I find very useful since it is always backed by correct provisions & rational reasoning.
Pls keep up the good work in guiding & grooming young professionals with your knowledge , skills & experience.
A selfless service indeed.

Warm regds

Abhishek Sahu

Senior Manager-Accounts I +91-9990095005

Welspring Universal Pvt ltd

Factory and Corporate Office:
43 KM Stone, NH-10, Delhi-Rohtak Road, Village Mandothi & Asauda,
Bahadurgarh - 124507, Haryana, India

Phone 01276-663600

Registered Office:
B-19 Mayapuri Phase 1, New Delhi - 110064, India



Arun Kumar Maitra

unread,
Jul 4, 2026, 1:16:09 AMJul 4
to gyan-gurukul-cs-d...@googlegroups.com, Gyan Gurukul - CS Divesh Goyal
I have further reviewed the matter and my views on the issues are as under:
My  logic is correct under standard auditing frameworks—an auditor cannot independently audit their own work or review a judgment they previously made. [1, 2, 3, 4]
Only a PCA can can certify Form STK-8.
The CA is not auditing the STK-8 again.
He only certifies that the company has followed the legal process to file this form.This is an act of attestation of compliance, not a re-audit of financial figures
Accordingly,dual signing of Form STK-8 and Form STK-2 by the statutory Auditor cannot be viewed as a self-review threat.
.CA CS Arun Kumar Maitra
Practicing Company Secretary

Arun Kumar Maitra

unread,
Jul 4, 2026, 1:23:33 AMJul 4
to gyan-gurukul-cs-d...@googlegroups.com, Gyan Gurukul - CS Divesh Goyal

Actually it is helping me to enhance my own knowledge as well as knowledge of my fellow professionals.
Moreover,these discussions are helping me during the Secretarial Audits of my clients.
I make detailed study before replying to any queries
Regards,.
.CA CS Arun Kumar Maitra
Practicing Company Secretary

natarajan subbaraman

unread,
Jul 4, 2026, 1:51:53 AMJul 4
to gyan-gurukul-cs-d...@googlegroups.com, Gyan Gurukul - CS Divesh Goyal
Yes sir 

I fully agree and Kudos to you sir.  Pl keep on appraising us in this line.

GOD BLESS YOU

Thanks 

rajan ghai

unread,
Jul 4, 2026, 2:49:06 AMJul 4
to gyan-gurukul-cs-d...@googlegroups.com, Gyan Gurukul - CS Divesh Goyal
Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages