Prominent Supreme Court Lawyer Rebecca John Clinically Dissects the Legal Aspects of the Premature Release of the Bilkis Bano Case Convicts

7 views
Skip to first unread message

Sukla Sen

unread,
Aug 22, 2022, 11:20:18 PM8/22/22
to foil-l


An excellent and very informed/informative discussion.

The most important point made is that the Supreme Court in its May 22 judgement had erred in forwarding the application for remission to the government of Gujarat instead of the government of Maharashtra where the trial had been conducted - in two stages, culminating in conviction.
This is clearly a breach of a judgement given by a constitution (i.e. a five-judge, or even larger) bench most categorically clarifying the issue - upholding the earlier judgements of the Supreme Court and endorsing the precedences.

The other two very significant points made are that seeking the views of (i) the judge presiding over the trial court and (ii) also that of the prosecuting agency is mandatory.
While it's not known whether these two requirements have been met, the concerned judge has opted to go public criticising the premature release (ref.: <https://www.barandbench.com/news/bilkis-bano-case-gujarat-government-has-set-a-bad-precedent-by-granting-remission-to-convicts-justice-ud-salvi>).

The moral (and political) dimensions have not been directly dealt with.

sukl...@gmail.com

unread,
Aug 23, 2022, 12:37:44 AM8/23/22
to Dalits Media Watch, foil-l
Footer

You are receiving this message because you are a member of the community Dalits Media Watch.

View this contribution on the web site

A reply to this message will be sent to all members of Dalits Media Watch.

Reply to all community members | Unsubscribe

Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages