You do not have permission to delete messages in this group
Copy link
Report message
Show original message
Either email addresses are anonymous for this group or you need the view member email addresses permission to view the original message
to GWT Contributors
Do you have any specific issues by following whats said in the document:
"You can mark each method in a JSO with @JsOverlay (that’s actually what they are) and replace the JSNI by following the instructions above."
So basically JSNI methods will become JsInterop native methods if they directly map to the underlying native JS type (typically these are the one-line JSNI methods). If JSNI methods have some more logic you would convert it to a Java method and mark it with @JsOverlay.
-- J.
confile
unread,
Feb 3, 2016, 8:31:31 AM2/3/16
Reply to author
Sign in to reply to author
Forward
Sign in to forward
Delete
You do not have permission to delete messages in this group
Copy link
Report message
Show original message
Either email addresses are anonymous for this group or you need the view member email addresses permission to view the original message
to GWT Contributors
Hi Jens,
does the class still have to extend JavaScriptObject?
Jens
unread,
Feb 3, 2016, 9:01:00 AM2/3/16
Reply to author
Sign in to reply to author
Forward
Sign in to forward
Delete
You do not have permission to delete messages in this group
Copy link
Report message
Show original message
Either email addresses are anonymous for this group or you need the view member email addresses permission to view the original message
to GWT Contributors
does the class still have to extend JavaScriptObject?