Has Material Charts been abandoned?

110 views
Skip to first unread message

Wes Melton

unread,
Jun 7, 2018, 2:23:42 PM6/7/18
to Google Visualization API
This thread on GitHub has been open for 2 years - doesn't look like much effort has been put in to finalizing feature parity with the first version of Google Charts. 


Legend: {position : 'bottom'}, as an example, has a number of mentions in the thread, and still doesn't work making the library fairly anemic compared to other open-source charting libraries. 

Are there any plans to bring feature parity up to date in future releases?

Daniel LaLiberte

unread,
Jun 7, 2018, 2:31:01 PM6/7/18
to Google Visualization API
The material charts that we implemented turned out to be somewhat of a dead-end regarding completion of the features.  This is because we started using a new framework internally for these charts, but that framework is not something we want to continue using.  

So instead, you can use the theme: 'material' option to get the fonts and colors of the material design, and we will add the few additional features and styles of the material charts into the corecharts with this theme: 'material' style.  Eventually, the material charts will redirect to the corecharts with this theme: 'material' style.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google Visualization API" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to google-visualizati...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to google-visua...@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/google-visualization-api.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/google-visualization-api/83a86847-f6f1-41dd-9ffe-258be7964dcf%40googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


--

Wes Melton

unread,
Jun 7, 2018, 3:21:39 PM6/7/18
to google-visua...@googlegroups.com
Thank you for the quick response. This is very helpful to understand. 

On Thu, Jun 7, 2018 at 2:30 PM, 'Daniel LaLiberte' via Google Visualization API <google-visua...@googlegroups.com> wrote:
The material charts that we implemented turned out to be somewhat of a dead-end regarding completion of the features.  This is because we started using a new framework internally for these charts, but that framework is not something we want to continue using.  

So instead, you can use the theme: 'material' option to get the fonts and colors of the material design, and we will add the few additional features and styles of the material charts into the corecharts with this theme: 'material' style.  Eventually, the material charts will redirect to the corecharts with this theme: 'material' style.
On Thu, Jun 7, 2018 at 2:23 PM Wes Melton <w...@smokymountains.com> wrote:
This thread on GitHub has been open for 2 years - doesn't look like much effort has been put in to finalizing feature parity with the first version of Google Charts. 


Legend: {position : 'bottom'}, as an example, has a number of mentions in the thread, and still doesn't work making the library fairly anemic compared to other open-source charting libraries. 

Are there any plans to bring feature parity up to date in future releases?

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google Visualization API" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to google-visualization-api+unsub...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to google-visualization-api@googlegroups.com.
--

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google Visualization API" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to google-visualization-api+unsub...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to google-visualization-api@googlegroups.com.
Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages