I sometimes see strange behaviour with how dots are connected in lines graphics, see image below for example. I am using the interpolateNulls option in the graph shown below as each line has data points available at different x intercepts.
There should be 4 lines in the graph below but as you can see because of the way the dots are connected it appears as though there are 7 lines (1 appears as it should, the other 3 appear as double lines).
This sometimes happens to all the lines in a graph, sometimes to just a subset of them and sometimes the graph appears as it should with data points properly connected.
Any idea what causes this or how to fix?
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google Visualization API" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to google-visualizati...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to google-visua...@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/google-visualization-api.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/google-visualization-api/186a97ce-c40b-4a11-b907-632e045a31fc%40googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Probably you have your points out of order. The points are not sorted by the chart, in case you intended this behavior. So each point is connected to the next one, no matter where it is plotted in the chart.
On Thu, Apr 12, 2018 at 7:10 PM Brad wrote:
I sometimes see strange behaviour with how dots are connected in lines graphics, see image below for example. I am using the interpolateNulls option in the graph shown below as each line has data points available at different x intercepts.
There should be 4 lines in the graph below but as you can see because of the way the dots are connected it appears as though there are 7 lines (1 appears as it should, the other 3 appear as double lines).
This sometimes happens to all the lines in a graph, sometimes to just a subset of them and sometimes the graph appears as it should with data points properly connected.
Any idea what causes this or how to fix?
--