--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "glorp-group" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to glorp-group...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/glorp-group/f5da4d37-0ad4-4d3d-a15d-4b8ee38cfaf9n%40googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/glorp-group/CAGWHZ99NhC50GRy9Xr0Zy8tkyYZDho%3DPW%2BG%2BhsBJwyCc63j%3Dbg%40mail.gmail.com.
Hi Esteban,
well, in that specific case I need to compare two sets of objects that may or may not have a counterpart in the respective other table.
Your question makes perfect sense and I thought about using an SQL View and map it to a specialized class for this specific case. It's a fresh idea I had last night, so maybe that is the way to go rather than implementing this on the GlorpExpressions level. An object that doesn't exist in the left table but has a counterpart in the right one is probably not something that can be modeled in objects without using some kind of Wrapper or Helper or Association in-between...
Joachim
You received this message because you are subscribed to a topic in the Google Groups "glorp-group" group.
To unsubscribe from this topic, visit https://groups.google.com/d/topic/glorp-group/aV2Pxhc1_o4/unsubscribe.
To unsubscribe from this group and all its topics, send an email to glorp-group...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/glorp-group/CAJMgPCKE9OkGDgX0bvS%3DstFpy1NNS%3DdLeGSFNGgzhE1yH6qa4Q%40mail.gmail.com.
-- ----------------------------------------------------------------------- objektfabrik GmbH mailto:jtu...@objektfabrik.de Fliederweg 1 http://www.objektfabrik.de D-71640 Ludwigsburg HRB 798847 Telefon: +49 7141 56 10 86 0 Amtsgericht Stuttgart
To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/glorp-group/1cb273d5-fef8-4f12-bb72-adf684cc4af1%40objektfabrik.de.