Hi All,
I'm with Doug on this one. It would be pathological to inject solely into one hemisphere. The original paper that looked at this (almost a decade ago, Haywood et al., 2013 although there are plenty of papers before this examining impacts of explosive volcanic
eruptions - e.g. Luke Oman and Alan Robock's work) showed that there are important detrimental impacts on the ITCZ and associated rainfall should injections occur in one hemisphere. There are a bunch of other papers that look at the energetics of preferential
heating one hemisphere in the HadGEM3 model (Haywood et al., and Hawcroft et al papers), plus a whole host of others with other models that show that perturbing the energy balance and hence the temperature
in one hemisphere will lead to shifts in the ITCZ.
In many ways the "injections in one hemisphere only" simulations were designed to head-off the idea that was mooted at the time that the current fleet of civil aircraft could be used as an effective climate intervention strategy. Having worked in this area
for a while, I should stress that such injection strategies are rather pathological.
What Doug (and others) have done is to develop feedback controllers that inject at multiple latitudes, and one of the primary objectives is to ensure that the northern and southern hemisphere coolings are similar to prevent any such detrimental impacts on the
ITCZ and associated rainfall.
Best Regards
Jim
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organisation. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognise the sender and know the content is safe.