Key impacts of climate engineering on biodiversity and ecosystems, with priorities for future research

34 views
Skip to first unread message

Andrew Lockley

unread,
Oct 29, 2022, 3:55:53 AM10/29/22
to CarbonDioxideRemoval@googlegroups.com <CarbonDioxideRemoval@googlegroups.com>, geoengineering

Abstract
Climate change has significant implications for biodiversity and ecosystems. With slow
progress towards reducing greenhouse gas emissions, climate engineering (or
‘geoengineering’) is receiving increasing attention for its potential to limit anthropogenic
climate change and its damaging effects. Proposed techniques, such as ocean fertilization for
carbon dioxide removal or stratospheric sulfate injections to reduce incoming solar radiation,
would significantly alter atmospheric, terrestrial and marine environments, yet potential sideeffects of their implementation for ecosystems and biodiversity have received little attention.
A literature review was carried out to identify details of the potential ecological effects of
climate engineering techniques. A group of biodiversity and environmental change
researchers then employed a modified Delphi expert consultation technique to evaluate this
evidence and prioritize the effects based on the relative importance of, and scientific
understanding about, their biodiversity and ecosystem consequences. The key issues and
knowledge gaps are used to shape a discussion of the biodiversity and ecosystem implications
of climate engineering, including novel climatic conditions, alterations to marine systems and
substantial terrestrial habitat change. This review highlights several current research priorities
in which the climate engineering context is crucial to consider, as well as identifying some
novel topics for ecological investigation.


Keywords
biodiversity, carbon dioxide removal, climate engineering, ecosystems, geoengineering, solar
radiation managemen

Key_impacts_of_climate_engineering_on_bi.pdf

Andrew Lockley

unread,
Oct 29, 2022, 3:57:51 AM10/29/22
to CarbonDioxideRemoval@googlegroups.com <CarbonDioxideRemoval@googlegroups.com>, geoengineering
Oops that's really old, sorry! 

Alan Robock ☮

unread,
Oct 29, 2022, 7:13:10 AM10/29/22
to andrew....@gmail.com, CarbonDiox...@googlegroups.com, geoengineering
I'm amazed that they did not even reference our recent article on the same topic:

Zarnetske, Phoebe L., Jessica Gurevitch, Janet Franklin, Peter Groffman, Cheryl Harrison, Jessica Hellmann, Forrest M. Hoffman, Shan Kothari, Alan Robock, Simone Tilmes, Daniele Visioni, Jin Wu, Lili Xia, and Cheng-En Yang, 2021: Potential ecological impacts of climate intervention by reflecting sunlight to cool the Earth. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci., 118 (15), e1921854118, doi:10.1073/pnas.1921854118. https://www.pnas.org/content/pnas/118/15/e1921854118.full.pdf

The abstract says, "A literature review was carried out to identify details of the potential ecological effects of climate engineering techniques." but it was clearly incomplete.

Alan Robock

Alan Robock, Distinguished Professor
Department of Environmental Sciences         Phone: +1-848-932-5751
Rutgers University                            E-mail: rob...@envsci.rutgers.edu
14 College Farm Road            http://people.envsci.rutgers.edu/robock
New Brunswick, NJ 08901-8551     ☮ https://twitter.com/AlanRobock

Signature


--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "geoengineering" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to geoengineerin...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/geoengineering/CAJ3C-07gFqi3ATMb%2BZ00NjcS2EoBuvxnKGd%2BvJiaNCxAAStCng%40mail.gmail.com.

Gideon Futerman

unread,
Oct 29, 2022, 9:23:21 AM10/29/22
to rob...@envsci.rutgers.edu, Andrew Lockley, CarbonDiox...@googlegroups.com, geoengineering
Your article was published 5 years after the article Andrew posted which is probably why! 🙂

SEBSASG_S_EMAIL.png

Cush Ngonzo Luwesi

unread,
Dec 18, 2022, 6:03:06 AM12/18/22
to ggfut...@gmail.com, Alan Robock, Andrew Lockley, CarbonDiox...@googlegroups.com, geoengineering
I realize that both Zanerstke et al. (2021) and McCormack et al. (2016) record a high level of uncertainty of solar GE technologies on ecosystems and biodiversity. But unlike the recent paper, the former one suggest new avenues of research to reduce the gap in knowledge. I actually buy the idea that researchers working on ecology and natural resources management shall focus on these pending issues to reduce the uncertainty of climate intervention. Otherwise, it can easily be weaponized by superpowers and destroy entire nations. In such case, we would have contributed to this moral hazard.
Cush

Prof. Cush Ngonzo Luwesi, PhD
Director of Postgraduate Studies (Francophone Africa Virtual Campus)
Ballsbridge University
WFG (jombi), Mesing 14, Willemstad, Curacao, The Netherlands
WhatsApp: +243 970 649 946
Website: www.fr-acedu.org
E-mail: lc...@fr-acedu.org

Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages