Climate Response to Pulse Versus Sustained Stratospheric Aerosol Forcing - Duan - - Geophysical Research Letters - Wiley Online Library

23 views
Skip to first unread message

Andrew Lockley

unread,
Aug 5, 2019, 5:34:07 PM8/5/19
to geoengineering
https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1029/2019GL083701

Climate Response to Pulse Versus Sustained Stratospheric Aerosol Forcing

First published: 05 August 2019
     

    Share on

    Abstract

    Solar geoengineering has been suggested as a potential means to counteract anthropogenic warming. Major volcanic eruptions have been used as natural analogues to large‐scale deployments of stratospheric aerosol geoengineering, yet difference in climate responses to these forcings remains unclear. Using the National Center for Atmospheric Research Community Earth System Model, we compare climate responses to two highly idealized stratospheric aerosol forcings that have different durations: a short‐term pulse representative of volcanic eruptions and a long‐term sustained forcing representative of geoengineering. For the same amount of global mean cooling, decreases in land temperature, precipitation, and runoff in the pulse case are much larger than that in the sustained case. The spatial pattern changes differ substantially between these two cases. Thus, direct extrapolations from volcanic eruption observations provide limited insight into impacts of potential stratospheric aerosol geoengineering. However, simulations of volcanic eruptions can be useful to test process representations in models that are used to simulate geoengineering deployments

    Reply all
    Reply to author
    Forward
    0 new messages