Oliver Morton <oliver...@economist.com>: Feb 13 11:29AM -0300
Late to this, but as I am working on something which uses geoengineering to
cover both solar and carbon geoengineering, a word to those eg Doug who see
no value in doing so.
For me there is value
...more
|
Wil Burns <w...@feronia.org>: Feb 13 02:57PM
Thanks, I concur on all accords. Wil
Get Outlook for iOS<https://aka.ms/o0ukef>
________________________________
From: Oliver Morton <oliver...@economist.com>
Sent: Monday, February 13, 2023
...more
|
Ken Caldeira <kcal...@carnegiescience.edu>: Feb 13 09:21AM -0800
I think the main problem is not with what words like "geoengineering"
denote, but rather with what they connote.
The discussion of responses to climate challenges has a political
...more
|
Wil Burns <w...@feronia.org>: Feb 13 05:42PM
Well, that’s a different consideration, but I don’t think you address that issue by advancing definitions that belie the reality of what we’re attempting to do in terms of large-scale deployment
...more
|
David desJardins <da...@desjardins.org>: Feb 13 03:02PM -0500
I don't really understand why it's important to people to include CDR as a
form of geoengineering. What's behind this fight? I suspect that a majority
would *not* include it in that term.
...more
|
"Hawkins, David" <dhaw...@nrdc.org>: Feb 13 10:04PM
It strikes me that large-scale human activity designed and intended to increase biological carbon stocks fits pretty well in the ambit of geo-engineering (recognizing that some amount of this
...more
|
Daniele Visioni <daniele...@gmail.com>: Feb 13 05:38PM -0500
If you ask people what geoengineering is, they will either include chemtrails, or recycling, depending on the context (there was research around it at some point in the past).
From the point of
...more
|