Hi All
Could anyone suggest
other input assumptions for the attached calculation about
cooling the Barrier Reef. There are two differences between this
and other estimates for spray quantity.
First we want to use a
mono-disperse spray of 0.8 microns liquid diameter at the very
bottom of the accumulation mode rather than the entire
accumulation mode used in some models where the mass of spray at
the top skirt of the accumulation mode is 100 times more.
Second we want to take the initial CCN concentration from Vallina rather than much higher numbers which have been used.
I assume everyone is familiar with Schwartz and Slingo.
I was puzzled why
histograms of nucleus size in the atmosphere are not more
continuous. Is is possible that the gap between accumulation
mode and Aitken mode is that the nuclei in the missing range
have already been grabbed?
The figure of $A1.6
million is close to my estimate for deciding whether or not that
we can filter sea water for 0.8 micron drops.
Apologies to people who have already been
sent this. You should have sent me your set of assumptions!
Stephen
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "geoengineering" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to geoengineerin...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to geoengi...@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/geoengineering.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/geoengineering/298384362.3834184.1562846960431%40mail.yahoo.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Hi All
Following the Barrier Reef cooling note Andrew Lockley suggested that I circulate Schwartz and Slingo's interpretation of Twomey's work. I found it more digestible than Twomey's original papers, even down to engineer's level.
I also attach an
appendix to another paper with more graphs and calculations. I have bounced these off Stephen
Schwartz. There is also another cooling project for
which other input assumptions have been requested but, so far,
to no effect.
For an El Niño demonstration we could divide the warm patch into two and write Morse code message as opposite cloud brightness values in each half. We would need to superimpose about a week's satellite images to get a convincing contrast increase.
If anyone in the governance
community can make a case for the protection of El Niño events
please make yourself known. We may even be able to make them
stronger.
Thank you in advance.
Stephen