Hi All
The Nature paper by Richard Lovett at
will annoy advocates for stratospheric sulphur more than those for marine cloud brightening.
It is a surprise to see this in Nature.
Stephen
Emeritus Professor of Engineering Design
School of Engineering
University of Edinburgh
Mayfield Road
Edinburgh EH9 3DW
Scotland
0131 662 1180
YouTube Jamie Taylor Power for Change
Hi Stephen – and cloud experts
I found this paper educational, by Shupe et al, 2004: Cloud Radiative Forcing of the Arctic Surface: The Influence of Cloud Properties, Surface Albedo, and Solar Zenith Angle: https://journals.ametsoc.org/view/journals/clim/17/3/1520-0442_2004_017_0616_crfota_2.0.co_2.xml
It says low level clouds in the Arctic only provide cooling during a short period during the summer. The rest of the year they warm the Arctic. So presumably, as increasingly warmer seas flow into the Arctic these clouds will get thicker (i.e. greater Liquid Water Path – LWP) because the air will be more humid, making each cloud droplet bigger. So, it seems that to cool the Arctic the oceans need to be cooled.
Have I got that right?
Clive
From: noac-m...@googlegroups.com <noac-m...@googlegroups.com> On Behalf Of Stephen Salter
Sent: Thursday, June 1, 2023 2:18 PM
To: 'geoengi...@googlegroups.com' <geoengi...@googlegroups.com>; 'noac-m...@googlegroups.com' <noac-m...@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Overshoot
Hi All
The Nature paper by Richard Lovett at
will annoy advocates for stratospheric sulphur more than those for marine cloud brightening.
It is a surprise to see this in Nature.
Stephen
>Nature - Overshoot
Yes a surprise, especially as it’s so easy to avoid another glacial period.
Clive
Emeritus Professor of Engineering Design
School of Engineering
University of Edinburgh
Mayfield Road
Edinburgh EH9 3DW
Scotland
0131 662 1180
YouTube Jamie Taylor Power for Change
The University of Edinburgh is a charitable body, registered in Scotland, with registration number SC005336. Is e buidheann carthannais a th’ ann an Oilthigh Dhùn Èideann, clàraichte an Alba, àireamh clàraidh SC005336.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "NOAC Meetings" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to noac-meeting...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/noac-meetings/PAXPR05MB8048B4B660B1A001F073EAB0A7499%40PAXPR05MB8048.eurprd05.prod.outlook.com.
Cooling the Oceans is a no-brainer, if it can be done.
There were a few recent publications talking about melting from “below”.
Here a recent WWF post including a Video explainer clearly targeted at the wider public (rather than experts).
https://www.arcticwwf.org/the-circle/stories/omg-greenlands-glaciers-are-melting-from-below/
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/noac-meetings/0afc01d99492%24b5f1d080%2421d57180%24%40EndorphinSoftware.co.uk.
Clive
It is true and also rather obvious that cloud brightening only works in summer and this is taken in the calculations about the number of spray vessels which I have circulated. Please let me know if you would like me to send them again.
I agree that warm water in winter would be bad and so we should do marine cloud brightening at lower latitudes through the year. This is a strong argument for vessel mobility. The cooling will still be done but with a time delay.
If the Alterskjaer and Kristjansson are correct about Aitken mode aerosol warming by clearing clouds because it removes lots of water without nucleation, then it might be possible to clear clouds in winter by spraying the very small aerosol. The old design of spray vessels had 18 spray heads. The present one has 32 so we could use smaller nozzles for part of the year. We could also dilute salt water with some desalinated water or take water from what has melted from Iceland. It is only the mass of salt in the aerosol that matters.
Below are graphs from Curry about radiation levels through the year. Please let me know if you have any more recent data.
Stephen
From: noac-m...@googlegroups.com <noac-m...@googlegroups.com>
On Behalf Of Achim Hoffmann
Sent: 01 June 2023 15:36
To: Clive Elsworth <Cl...@EndorphinSoftware.co.uk>; geoengi...@googlegroups.com; noac-m...@googlegroups.com
Subject: RE: Clouds in the Arctic only provide cooling during a short period during the summer
This email was sent to you by someone outside the University.
You should only click on links or attachments if you are certain that the email is genuine and the content is safe.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/noac-meetings/LO6P123MB6613F271C10756E8898A8BFFBA499%40LO6P123MB6613.GBRP123.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM.
Thanks Stephen
I was wondering if anything other than cooling the flow of the oceans into the Arctic could help to cool Greenland ice outside the short period when MCB would work.
If droplet scavenging turns out to be effective, we may be able to do it over Greenland from drones or land-based stations, using our non-toxic white coloured Artificial Loess Dust aerosol that forms from vaporous chlorides and degenerates to clay after sedimenting.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/noac-meetings/PAXPR05MB80489A176DEF99CC24AAA627A74EA%40PAXPR05MB8048.eurprd05.prod.outlook.com.
Hi Clive
I was chatting this week with Stephen Salter about Marine Cloud Brightening at different latitudes. It is a misconception, which I also shared, that directly cooling ocean currents flowing into the Arctic offers the main potential intervention for refreezing. The main global cooling potential, including for the poles, is in cooling the tropics.
Only about 15% of the Earth (~75 million km2) is north of 45° North latitude. As well as being far smaller than the tropics, the high latitude regions are obviously far colder and darker, and therefore cannot be cooled as much as hotter regions.
Applying marine cloud brightening in the tropics can refreeze the poles through the combination of cooler currents and cooler air temperature circulating to the poles. High latitude MCB is also essential, given the combination of arctic amplification and that summer insolation is highest at the poles, but this seasonal polar warmth is relatively small and brief on global scale. Stephen also pointed out that GEOMIP models that restrict MCB to the band within 30° of the equator fail to recognise the importance of also deploying salty mist at higher latitudes.
Like a Mercator Projection, the political sway of the cold north seems to inflate its size in our imagination.
Regards
Robert Tulip
.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/noac-meetings/0e3001d99549%24ee5bdfd0%24cb139f70%24%40EndorphinSoftware.co.uk.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/noac-meetings/010c01d99674%244f8a59a0%24ee9f0ce0%24%40rtulip.net.