New e_machine value for Tachyum's processor

[Jeff Law]

Can we get an e_machine value assigned for Tachyum's upcoming processor?   I don't really care about the number as once assigned we'll just rebuild the world internally.

Thanks,

Jeff

[Cary Coutant]

I've reserved the value 261 for this processor, pending more info from Jeff.

-cary

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Generic System V Application Binary Interface" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to generic-abi...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/generic-abi/f47bc57d-b071-4de2-94c4-253ba37f5115n%40googlegroups.com.

[Jeff Law]

On 8/6/2021 4:09 PM, Cary Coutant wrote:
> I'll hold the value 261 for you. Please provide the following:
>
> - Company name: Tachyum
> - Name of architecture/processor:
> - Preferred EM_ name:
> - Contact info (will this be you?): name, email and/or phone
>
> If there's any public info about the processor, please provide a URL.
>
> (We won't publish your email or phone number.)
>
> If you don't have a processor name yet, I'll just list it as "reserved by Tachyum".
Sorry, for some reason your  message got marked as spam.


I'm a fine contact point.

Jeff Law
jl...@tachyum.com

Use "Tachyum" as the processor name.  That seems to be the consensus
here.  EM_TACHYUM should be fine as well.

No current public information.  What's out there is quite dated.

Jeff