Thanks Jack!
I don’t understand why social discourse should be required to be centralized on a ledger.
See:
Citadels: faster response time and better information integration than remote datacenters
https://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=2836282
Regards,
Carl
https://professorhewitt.blogspot.com/
From: fr...@googlegroups.com <fr...@googlegroups.com>
On Behalf Of jack mills
Sent: Thursday, July 1, 2021 04:00
To: friam <fr...@googlegroups.com>
Subject: [friam] an alternative to ActivityPub for decentralized social networks?
another example of the (free) market responding to the censorship of the existing centralized social networks: https://cointelegraph.com/news/former-la-dodgers-owner-earmarks-100m-for-blockchain-based-social-media
because said censorship is possible due to the fact that these are centralized systems, the obvious alternative to explore is decentralization (personally, i consider "decentralized" to be a superset of "blockchain" but those two concepts are frequently conflated).
this will be based on a new protocol similar to ActivityPub called the Decentralized Social Networking Protocol (DSNP): https://unfinished.com/wp-content/uploads/dsnp_whitepaper.pdf
DSNP also addresses identity, authentication, and security.
Thanks Jack!
I don’t understand why social discourse should be required to be centralized on a ledger.
- Identity: Participants are identified by their public keys which can be hashed, have pet names, and other affordances.
- Security: Security of participants information is maintained in their Citadels. Security of communication is maintained by encryption.
- Authenticity: Authenticity of information is maintained by provenance and signing.
- Portability: Portability across devices is maintained by a Citadel.
- Usability: Participants can interact with devices in their citadel including future electronic glasses.
- Extensibility: A Citadel can be changed and upgraded over time.
See:
Citadels: faster response time and better information integration than remote datacenters
https://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=2836282
Regards,
Carl
https://professorhewitt.blogspot.com/
From: fr...@googlegroups.com <fr...@googlegroups.com> On Behalf Of jack mills
Sent: Thursday, July 1, 2021 04:00
To: friam <fr...@googlegroups.com>
Subject: [friam] an alternative to ActivityPub for decentralized social networks?
another example of the (free) market responding to the censorship of the existing centralized social networks: https://cointelegraph.com/news/former-la-dodgers-owner-earmarks-100m-for-blockchain-based-social-media
because said censorship is possible due to the fact that these are centralized systems, the obvious alternative to explore is decentralization (personally, i consider "decentralized" to be a superset of "blockchain" but those two concepts are frequently conflated).
this will be based on a new protocol similar to ActivityPub called the Decentralized Social Networking Protocol (DSNP): https://unfinished.com/wp-content/uploads/dsnp_whitepaper.pdf
DSNP also addresses identity, authentication, and security.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "friam" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to friam+un...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/friam/BY5PR10MB4274E29DBB51A85331C5D50FD9009%40BY5PR10MB4274.namprd10.prod.outlook.com.