On the surface or in the gas phase? In any case, read the User's Guide section on Output, in particular device output.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to a topic in the Google Groups "FDS and Smokeview Discussions" group.
To unsubscribe from this topic, visit https://groups.google.com/d/topic/fds-smv/ZI7fB7p_W0I/unsubscribe.
To unsubscribe from this group and all its topics, send an email to fds-smv+u...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/fds-smv/CAAJimDHz5eXRVaPCGg55AY%3Do2kA5gHz31i5Or4NwggcyzbAFbg%40mail.gmail.com.
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "FDS and Smokeview Discussions" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to fds-smv+u...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/fds-smv/CAGserLVyALGDJug1pK%3DZ%2By2p1KYn6pFyH5ejgFAt0VMgXGdFjg%40mail.gmail.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/fds-smv/4239d09e-ed3c-4494-a79b-a068c354ebean%40googlegroups.com.
The furnace dimensions are accurately depicted in the model. The four heating elements provide ~2 kW to the cavity. They are an approximation of coiled Nichrome on ceramic formers. The domain should be self-evident from the model. You need to rationalize the computational domain for your particular purposes. Run the model with T_END = 0 and view it in SmokeView, or import it into PyroSim. The purpose of the model was to examine the effectiveness of the composite insulation (hence the use of HT3D) and confirm the radiation field and convective heat flow for optimal positioning of the control thermocouple and heating elements. You should have little difficultly scaling the heat, dimensions and insulation. Depending on your competency with FDS this may take some research and experimentation, but unless you fully describe what you are trying to model, why, for what purpose, and provide an address for invoicing, it is perhaps unreasonable to anticipate that a forum member will write your model for you.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/fds-smv/CAGserLVtmeG9f-of9rUDcmEFU3KsNsnP%2Bu_6pC7UbyWV0XRUzw%40mail.gmail.com.
Thank you for the feedback and suggestions Jason.
I’ll complete the furnace construction and testing before considering further model refinement. Modeling a-priori is, in my opinion, always more challenging than trying to duplicate the results from an experiment. The only remaining challenge to construction has been machining the element supports (rescued from radiant space heaters) to length, but a diamond drill and cut-off wheel seem to do the trick.
The anticipated gas leakage through the walls is expected to be limited. In practice the internal walls are to be lined with a Sodium Silicate/Aluminum Oxide slurry (to protect the calcium silicate board and improve internal re-radiation). This is also used as an adhesive between layers. The hole in the centre of the door will actual exit to prevent significant over-pressure from steam and other gas emissions from the charge (a range of interesting Molybdenum catalysts that require long, moderate temperature, say 400°C, heating for activation).
With kindest regards,
Tim
From: fds...@googlegroups.com [mailto:fds...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of dr_jfloyd
Sent: Thursday, 7 July 2022 10:32 PM
To: FDS and Smokeview Discussions
Subject: Re: [fds-smv] Modelling an electrical furnace
Nice looking model. A couple of suggestions:
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/fds-smv/0e7b16ad-5412-41b6-99fb-36eca749facfn%40googlegroups.com.