> I read today in Neuroscience News that gut microbes control our body's temperature. I assume that they are not there at birth, though they could have been picked up via the birth canal. How does it happen that entirely separate organisms come to regulate any body function?
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "extropolis" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to extropolis+...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/extropolis/CAJPayv3qEzMP%2BOE5bRQUu_fw0RygFiJWaOL_Si3XuydcRW3M0A%40mail.gmail.com.
> I understand the process whereby mitochondria becomes part of our cells, but not how we become reliant on gut microbes.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/extropolis/CAO%2BxQEbB4U07F0%3DmZoo-NrXcCrw_m-U2EU7Db%3DeXDUsqtXd1UQ%40mail.gmail.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/extropolis/CAJPayv0FzE9a14mgJ90J5Jt%3D9zkrnoWo5_ep2ES%3D-cYrcaJbvg%40mail.gmail.com.
> Thanks John - that helps. But a swarm of microbes don't get into the stomach knowing how to make neurotransmitters, eh? "Hey, the transmitters in the brain are running low. Let's learn how to make them!"
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "extropolis" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to extropolis+...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/extropolis/CAJPayv34SONcCBWmhrcCFbQNY542%3DpUy-yfGuZ4E0BGt5%2B_N6g%40mail.gmail.com.
> John, let's anthropomorphize a bit here: how would bacteria get the idea to make anything our body can use, rather than just sit there and eat what we put down the tubes? bill w
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "extropolis" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to extropolis+...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/extropolis/CAJPayv3i3-8Fm17iscGP2GNnj3BUC1Wr7HSOoOG0BTmxpbgxCQ%40mail.gmail.com.
> Continuing the anthropomorphism:John, out of zillions of chemicals that microbes could make, how did they decide to make something like dopamine?
> How did they decide to take over the person's temperature regulation? bill w
On Sun, Jan 22, 2023 at 8:47 AM John Clark <johnk...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Sun, Jan 22, 2023 at 8:50 AM William Flynn Wallace <fooz...@gmail.com> wrote:> John, let's anthropomorphize a bit here: how would bacteria get the idea to make anything our body can use, rather than just sit there and eat what we put down the tubes? bill wBacteria don't have ideas but, as I have said, they can make neurotransmitters, and if by random mutation one of a bacteria's genes causes it to make more neurotransmitters than average, and if that new ability changes a host's behavior in such a way that it increases the chance the bacteria's mutated gene will get into the next generation, then the mutated bacteria will soon become the predominant type of bacteria in the host. This example is about fungus not bacteria, but it's the same general idea :"When the fungus infects a carpenter ant, it grows through the insect’s body, draining it of nutrients and hijacking its mind. Over the course of a week, it compels the ant to leave the safety of its nest and ascend a nearby plant stem. It stops the ant at a height of 25 centimeters—a zone with precisely the right temperature and humidity for the fungus to grow. It forces the ant to permanently lock its mandibles around a leaf. Eventually, it sends a long stalk through the ant’s head, growing into a bulbous capsule full of spores. And because the ant typically climbs a leaf that overhangs its colony’s foraging trails, the fungal spores rain down onto its sisters below, zombifying them in turn."It's hard to believe but the idea that morality could be found in nature was very popular around 1900 in the Social Darwinism movement. Ironically Darwin himself was not a Social Darwinist, and he lost his religious faith because he thought a God that sanctioned a hideously cruel process like Natural Selection did not deserve worship. He writes that he was very disturbed at the reproductive behavior of a species of wasp that he discovered as a young man. The wasp stings a spider enough to paralyze it but not enough to kill it, the wasp then lays its eggs on the poor beast. When the eggs hatch several days later the maggots slowly consume the still living creature, carefully avoiding
vital organs for as long as possible and leaving the brain for last.In spite of the objections of his very religious but loving wife, Darwin says in his 1876 autobiography :
"Disbelief crept over me at a very slow rate but at last was
complete. The rate was so slow that I felt no distress, and have
never since doubted even for a single second that my conclusion
was correct. I can indeed hardly see how anyone ought to wish
Christianity to be true; for if so the plain language of the text
seems to show that the men who do not believe, and this would
include my Father, Brother and almost all my best friends, will be
everlastingly punished. And this is a damnable doctrine."John K Clark
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "extropolis" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to extropolis+...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/extropolis/CAJPayv2Us4OQaGKOExqsE9_KUym3BAWjGk1Rt5k-9-kPMiitTQ%40mail.gmail.com.
> I think you are evading the question a little bit. My question really is not what happens when they make chemicals that we can use. That's easy - evolution.It's how the Hell did it get started. bill w
On Sun, Jan 22, 2023 at 1:31 PM John Clark <johnk...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Sun, Jan 22, 2023 at 12:28 PM William Flynn Wallace <fooz...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Continuing the anthropomorphism:John, out of zillions of chemicals that microbes could make, how did they decide to make something like dopamine?Dopamine is a simple chemical, C8H11NO2, and it has other biochemical uses besides being a neurotransmitter; it must have because potato plants and bananas produce dopamine and they don't even have nerves, much less a brain. So it's not surprising that bacteria, which are masters of chemical engineering, can make dopamine too.> How did they decide to take over the person's temperature regulation? bill wThe answer remains the same. If regulating a host's temperature conveys an advantage in the struggle for existence and if a bacteria is able to do that even slightly better than average then bacteria like that will become more common than those that don't have that ability.
On Sun, Jan 22, 2023 at 8:47 AM John Clark <johnk...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Sun, Jan 22, 2023 at 8:50 AM William Flynn Wallace <fooz...@gmail.com> wrote:> John, let's anthropomorphize a bit here: how would bacteria get the idea to make anything our body can use, rather than just sit there and eat what we put down the tubes? bill wBacteria don't have ideas but, as I have said, they can make neurotransmitters, and if by random mutation one of a bacteria's genes causes it to make more neurotransmitters than average, and if that new ability changes a host's behavior in such a way that it increases the chance the bacteria's mutated gene will get into the next generation, then the mutated bacteria will soon become the predominant type of bacteria in the host. This example is about fungus not bacteria, but it's the same general idea :"When the fungus infects a carpenter ant, it grows through the insect’s body, draining it of nutrients and hijacking its mind. Over the course of a week, it compels the ant to leave the safety of its nest and ascend a nearby plant stem. It stops the ant at a height of 25 centimeters—a zone with precisely the right temperature and humidity for the fungus to grow. It forces the ant to permanently lock its mandibles around a leaf. Eventually, it sends a long stalk through the ant’s head, growing into a bulbous capsule full of spores. And because the ant typically climbs a leaf that overhangs its colony’s foraging trails, the fungal spores rain down onto its sisters below, zombifying them in turn."It's hard to believe but the idea that morality could be found in nature was very popular around 1900 in the Social Darwinism movement. Ironically Darwin himself was not a Social Darwinist, and he lost his religious faith because he thought a God that sanctioned a hideously cruel process like Natural Selection did not deserve worship. He writes that he was very disturbed at the reproductive behavior of a species of wasp that he discovered as a young man. The wasp stings a spider enough to paralyze it but not enough to kill it, the wasp then lays its eggs on the poor beast. When the eggs hatch several days later the maggots slowly consume the still living creature, carefully avoiding
vital organs for as long as possible and leaving the brain for last.
In spite of the objections of his very religious but loving wife, Darwin says in his 1876 autobiography :
"Disbelief crept over me at a very slow rate but at last was
complete. The rate was so slow that I felt no distress, and have
never since doubted even for a single second that my conclusion
was correct. I can indeed hardly see how anyone ought to wish
Christianity to be true; for if so the plain language of the text
seems to show that the men who do not believe, and this would
include my Father, Brother and almost all my best friends, will be
everlastingly punished. And this is a damnable doctrine."
John K Clark See what's on my new list at Extropolis
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "extropolis" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to extropolis+...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/extropolis/CAJPayv2_jbcGzRBFHHffbSb1DZtHLSKcDh0QRA_K2NL_J1UdCw%40mail.gmail.com.