Since photons are redshifted as the universe expands, this is offered to support the claim that energy is not conserved in GR. When I asked where the lost energy goes, the answer offered is that it "disappears". I find this answer woefully insufficient for the following reason: if energy in GR is not conserved, it just means that a photon's energy changes as the universe expands. No matter at what time in the evolution of the universe, the photon's energy remains unchanged if it's conserved. That is, conservation of energy means the photon's energy remains unchanged. It doesn't say the lost energy "disappears". So the open question IMO is this; where does the lost energy go, and GR does not answer this question. AG --
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to everything-li...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/c4f9cc59-c244-42d3-a71a-23699da91610n%40googlegroups.com.
Forget GR. Ask yourself where would it go in an expanding Newtonian universe?
Brent
On Sunday, November 9, 2025 at 2:14:22 PM UTC-7 Brent Meeker wrote:
Forget GR. Ask yourself where would it go in an expanding Newtonian universe?
Brent
My conjecture is that the lost energy is absorbed into the surrounding space. To claim it "disappears" is to indulge in magic. AG
On 11/9/2025 1:37 AM, Alan Grayson wrote:
Since photons are redshifted as the universe expands, this is offered to support the claim that energy is not conserved in GR. When I asked where the lost energy goes, the answer offered is that it "disappears". I find this answer woefully insufficient for the following reason: if energy in GR is not conserved, it just means that a photon's energy changes as the universe expands. No matter at what time in the evolution of the universe, the photon's energy remains unchanged if it's conserved. That is, conservation of energy means the photon's energy remains unchanged. It doesn't say the lost energy "disappears". So the open question IMO is this; where does the lost energy go, and GR does not answer this question. AG --
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to everything-li...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/d6ed1805-106a-4d27-85ab-089e43510ae2n%40googlegroups.com.
On 11/9/2025 4:04 PM, Alan Grayson wrote:
On Sunday, November 9, 2025 at 2:14:22 PM UTC-7 Brent Meeker wrote:
Forget GR. Ask yourself where would it go in an expanding Newtonian universe?
Brent
My conjecture is that the lost energy is absorbed into the surrounding space. To claim it "disappears" is to indulge in magic. AGYou think EM radiation is absorbed into space. How is this different than "it disappears"; is the space heated up?
Brent