Doublevil didn't actually say the task was trivial. I'd classify it as
straightforward for about 99% of the entries, and messy for the other
1%.
He/she/it also said: "but I'm not sure why they would be needed in the
first place".
My interest was to add the derived furigana as an option to the
WWWJDIC server. To do this I'd need to align the dictionary entries
with the JmdictFurigana data. The alignment would be simple if the
sequence numbers were in both streams. Otherwise, I'd have to do a
(daily) kanji/reading alignment as I use the latest dictionary
version. Not impossible but messy when many readings have multiple
kanji forms and readings.
JIm
> To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/edict-jmdict/CAOGcgZrDP99LGWmh7dfOH7fnAnabneR7XG-zZexeNeoP9FKuew%40mail.gmail.com.