Hi Ananth,
Sorry, bit late. Did you get any further than this? I’m not expert on cyberballing myself, but I do understand that you could try Tutorial VIII “The cyberball game” from our E-Primer. There’s actually a step-by-step instruction on how to make one.
Best,
Michiel
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "E-Prime" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to e-prime+u...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to e-p...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/e-prime/2aaba866-f187-4549-bab2-2f1e4fff483a%40googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to a topic in the Google Groups "E-Prime" group.
To unsubscribe from this topic, visit https://groups.google.com/d/topic/e-prime/tpVLZXYTQwk/unsubscribe.
To unsubscribe from this group and all its topics, send an email to e-prime+u...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to e-p...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/e-prime/002f01d008ce%248fbfa0d0%24af3ee270%24%40eu.
Hi,
Wow, somebody who has it J.
As for answers to the questions: the issue is that I would love to help, but in order to understand the problem, I would have to understand the parameters, for which I need to extract your experiment and take at least one hour, which is more than I’m willing to spend given other urgent matters. If you think it’s something a cyberball expert (I’m not) will be immediately familiar with, then you might try to contact Dr. Van Steenbergen directly; but if it’s not his own code, then you’d do well to explain it very thoroughly (because understanding someone else’s code is really hard!).
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/e-prime/CANw1UKG8%3DAdyOZ9BdRkgBJCU47n2x-o6gE_EtpDq9%2Bf6qHX5dA%40mail.gmail.com.
Hi,
I was feeling a bit sorry now, so I took a look anyway. What can I say? Well this: I’m sorry to say this, but this experiment is really ugly and indeed a real mess. There’s hardly a structure – it’s fully linear (I guess this is fMRI style) – and the objects are rarely named. I think you’ll find it much easier to go through the easy steps described in the book.
That said:
· Getting more trials: by just adding more ImageDisplays and Inlines before the rest. There’s no list for it.
· There are many throw lists, but they are unreferenced. Look at throw1b: it throws from 1 to 2 (always, because why randomize?). After that, ImageDisplay08, which is the player holding the ball. Look at Inline08:
If ImageDisplay08.RESP = "1" Then
throw2.Run c
ElseIf ImageDisplay08.RESP = "2" Then
throw3.Run c
ElseIf ImageDisplay08.RESP = "" Then
throw3.Run c
End If
So, if player response 1, throw2 is run, if player responds 2 (or otherwise), throw3 is run. Look in the unreferenced objects (there are hundreds, some used by the experiment, some just for l0lz). I found throw3, there’s List3 inside. List3 runs, in sequence 2to3 and then 3to1. Done with the list, now ImageDisplay09. And so on.
There are also many wonky errors, like fixations not in the middle (except sometimes), and it is also really quite ugly. I think you’ll really be better off using The Eprimer’s style.
Also, one word of caution. Of course people come here to learn and perfection is obviously not going to happen. However, this is the internet, which is a global thing: if you send your experiment over the internet, do make sure it looks good and feels otherwise a bit professional. Looks good for your lab and personal skills!
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/e-prime/007401d00973%24b6cbc140%24246343c0%24%40eu.