--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to django-users...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to django...@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/django-users.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/django-users/8bd4e6b5-42c5-4779-86af-cb04b708540d%40googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Yeah, I came across that as well, but it didn't work on 1.6. I cloned and debugged it up until I got the exact same error as the paste in my first message. :(So, a few questions:
- Am I correct in my analysis that the syncdb command alone is generating the table creation sql that includes the constraint redshift is barfing on?
- If I were to patch the syncdb command code, is it reasonable to consult the database backend for settings related to which constraints are allowed/not?
- Does it make more sense for the database backend code to do the table creation instead of syncdb? (As in, db backends provide might an abstracted create table method that syncdb could just call instead of building its own sql.)
I know more than I did a day ago, but I'm still not super hip on how db backends are implemented and how the rest of the framework interacts with them. So if the stuff I'm asking doesn't make sense then do put me on the right path. :)Thanks!jpk
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to django-users...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to django...@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/django-users.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/django-users/5a094392-088f-4062-b85a-2a0a24bf192b%40googlegroups.com.