--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to django-users...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to django...@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/django-users.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/django-users/11a21a82-4dbe-4515-babe-1e9d468e0f35%40googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
-- Etienne Robillard tka...@yandex.com https://www.isotopesoftware.ca/
Hello Gary,
To me these comparisons are largely meaningless. For example, they compare PostgreSQL to MongoDB. You can't really do that any more than you can compare an apple to an orange. They compare aiohttp to Django; my first reaction to that was "why is aiohttp only twice as fast as Django?". On how much RAM is this? What is the PostgreSQL client library they use for aiohttp? Is it async? What's the point of using aiohttp for a database intensive application if you don't have an async PostgreSQL client library? Is it aiohttp with the standard library loop or with uvloop? Likewise with Django, they use some kind of asynchronous wsgi server, but what about the PostgreSQL client library? Assuming it's synchronous, how many processes do they run?
Even if these questions are answered, we'd have more questions. What application is this for? Why was it made this way and not in another way? Why does it not use a cache or why does it use a cache?
Why do you care about these benchmarks? What is the problem you are trying to solve by consulting these benchmarks?
Regards,
Antonis
Antonis Christofides http://djangodeployment.com