[Django] #25658: Add an optional positional argument to inspectdb to allow choosing what table/views should be inspected
Django
table/views should be inspected
----------------------------------------------+-----------------------
Reporter: JoseTomasTocino | Owner: nobody
Type: New feature | Status: new
Component: Database layer (models, ORM) | Version: 1.8
Severity: Normal | Keywords: inspectdb
Triage Stage: Unreviewed | Has patch: 0
Easy pickings: 0 | UI/UX: 0
----------------------------------------------+-----------------------
Comes from this discussion: https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic
/django-developers/CuczZovhp74
It would be great to be able to manually choose what table and/or views
should be inspected when using the `inspectdb` command, specially in
situations where readable table/views are not properly reported by the DB.
Here's a pull request with my proposed solution:
https://github.com/django/django/pull/5530
--
Ticket URL: <https://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/25658>
Django <https://code.djangoproject.com/>
The Web framework for perfectionists with deadlines.
Django
table/views should be inspected
Reporter: JoseTomasTocino | Owner:
| JoseTomasTocino
Type: New feature | Status: assigned
Component: Database layer | Version: 1.8
(models, ORM) |
Severity: Normal | Resolution:
Keywords: inspectdb | Triage Stage:
| Unreviewed
Needs tests: 0 | Patch needs improvement: 0
Easy pickings: 0 | UI/UX: 0
Changes (by JoseTomasTocino):
* status: new => assigned
* needs_better_patch: => 0
* needs_tests: => 0
* owner: nobody => JoseTomasTocino
* needs_docs: => 0
* has_patch: 0 => 1
--
Ticket URL: <https://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/25658#comment:1>
Django
table/views should be inspected
Reporter: JoseTomasTocino | Owner:
| JoseTomasTocino
Type: New feature | Status: assigned
commands) |
Severity: Normal | Resolution:
Keywords: inspectdb | Triage Stage: Accepted
Has patch: 1 | Needs documentation: 1
Needs tests: 0 | Patch needs improvement: 0
Easy pickings: 0 | UI/UX: 0
Changes (by claudep):
* needs_docs: 0 => 1
* version: 1.8 => master
* component: Database layer (models, ORM) => Core (Management commands)
* stage: Unreviewed => Accepted
--
Ticket URL: <https://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/25658#comment:2>
Django
table/views should be inspected
Reporter: JoseTomasTocino | Owner:
| JoseTomasTocino
Type: New feature | Status: assigned
Component: Core (Management | Version: master
commands) |
Severity: Normal | Resolution:
Keywords: inspectdb | Triage Stage: Accepted
Needs tests: 0 | Patch needs improvement: 0
Easy pickings: 0 | UI/UX: 0
Changes (by JoseTomasTocino):
* needs_docs: 1 => 0
Comment:
Added docs and release notes in the pull request.
--
Ticket URL: <https://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/25658#comment:3>
Django
table/views should be inspected
Reporter: JoseTomasTocino | Owner:
| JoseTomasTocino
Component: Core (Management | Version: master
commands) |
Keywords: inspectdb | Triage Stage: Accepted
Has patch: 1 | Needs documentation: 0
Easy pickings: 0 | UI/UX: 0
Changes (by timgraham):
* status: assigned => closed
* resolution: => wontfix
Comment:
I think #14098 should solve this use case. Tables which can't be
introspected will now be skipped.
--
Ticket URL: <https://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/25658#comment:4>
Django
table/views should be inspected
Reporter: JoseTomasTocino | Owner:
| JoseTomasTocino
commands) |
Severity: Normal | Resolution:
Has patch: 1 | Needs documentation: 0
Easy pickings: 0 | UI/UX: 0
Changes (by timgraham):
* status: closed => new
* resolution: wontfix =>
Comment:
Now I realized the problem isn't that the table can't be introspected but
that it's not returned by the existing introspection query on Oracle. So
we either need to revise that query or accept this feature.
--
Ticket URL: <https://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/25658#comment:5>
Django
table/views should be inspected
Reporter: JoseTomasTocino | Owner:
| JoseTomasTocino
Component: Core (Management | Version: master
commands) |
Keywords: inspectdb | Triage Stage: Accepted
Has patch: 1 | Needs documentation: 0
Easy pickings: 0 | UI/UX: 0
Changes (by Tim Graham <timograham@…>):
* status: new => closed
* resolution: => fixed
Comment:
In [changeset:"39a16dd2e003f9ca82a6d061a022ced6904bd243" 39a16dd]:
{{{
#!CommitTicketReference repository=""
revision="39a16dd2e003f9ca82a6d061a022ced6904bd243"
Fixed #25658 -- Allowed inspectdb to inspect a specific set of tables.
}}}
--
Ticket URL: <https://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/25658#comment:6>