* stage: Unreviewed => Accepted
Old description:
> I think there are a couple small improvements that could be made to the
> docs here:
>
> * The "Via the Python API" section could do with a simple shell example
> for creating a `Redirect`, since otherwise the fields aren't mentioned in
> the docs. I also imagine it might be used by relatively new users who
> aren't confident with the ORM.
> * The `Redirect.new_path` field's `help_text` states `full URL starting
> with “http://””`. This doesn't mention the now-more-common `https://`,
> nor the fact that arbitrary protocols are technically supported, such as
> `onion://`. Perhaps `full URL starting with a scheme such as "https://
New description:
I think there are a couple small improvements that could be made to the
docs here:
* The "Via the Python API" section could do with a simple shell example
for creating a `Redirect`, since otherwise the fields aren't mentioned in
the docs. I also imagine it might be used by relatively new users who
aren't confident with the ORM.
* The `Redirect.new_path` field's `help_text` states `full URL starting
with “http://””`. This doesn't mention the now-more-common `https://`, nor
the fact that arbitrary protocols are technically supported, such as
`onion://`. Perhaps `full URL starting with a scheme such as` https://
--
--
Ticket URL: <https://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/31541#comment:2>
Django <https://code.djangoproject.com/>
The Web framework for perfectionists with deadlines.