[Django] #24499: Drop support for PostGIS 1.5
Django
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Reporter: timgraham | Owner: timgraham
Type: | Status: new
Cleanup/optimization |
Component: GIS | Version: master
Severity: Normal | Keywords:
Triage Stage: | Has patch: 0
Unreviewed |
Needs documentation: 0 | Needs tests: 0
Patch needs improvement: 0 | Easy pickings: 0
UI/UX: 0 |
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
It's 5+ years old and no longer receiving updates.
--
Ticket URL: <https://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/24499>
Django <https://code.djangoproject.com/>
The Web framework for perfectionists with deadlines.
Django
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Reporter: timgraham | Owner: timgraham
Type: | Status: new
Cleanup/optimization |
Component: GIS | Version: master
Keywords: | Triage Stage:
| Unreviewed
Has patch: 1 | Needs documentation: 0
Needs tests: 0 | Patch needs improvement: 0
Easy pickings: 0 | UI/UX: 0
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
* has_patch: 0 => 1
Comment:
[https://github.com/django/django/pull/4345 PR]
--
Ticket URL: <https://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/24499#comment:1>
Django
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Reporter: timgraham | Owner: timgraham
Type: | Status: new
Cleanup/optimization |
Component: GIS | Version: master
Keywords: | Triage Stage:
| Unreviewed
Needs tests: 0 | Patch needs improvement: 0
Easy pickings: 0 | UI/UX: 0
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Comment (by claudep):
I'm not so enthusiast about dropping it now. It's still in use by many
stable distros, hopefully not any longer when 1.9 will be released, but
still... What about dropping it in Django 2.0?
--
Ticket URL: <https://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/24499#comment:2>
Django
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Reporter: timgraham | Owner: timgraham
Type: | Status: new
Cleanup/optimization |
Component: GIS | Version: master
Keywords: | Triage Stage:
| Unreviewed
Needs tests: 0 | Patch needs improvement: 0
Easy pickings: 0 | UI/UX: 0
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Comment (by timgraham):
If you think it's still providing value, I'm not in a rush, but I raised
the issue because Daniel said his
[https://github.com/django/django/pull/4339 raster work] requires PostGIS
2.0. We'll just have to add a feature flag for that.
--
Ticket URL: <https://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/24499#comment:3>
Django
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Reporter: timgraham | Owner: timgraham
Type: | Status: new
Cleanup/optimization |
Component: GIS | Version: master
Keywords: 2.0 | Triage Stage:
| Someday/Maybe
Has patch: 1 | Needs documentation: 0
Needs tests: 0 | Patch needs improvement: 1
Easy pickings: 0 | UI/UX: 0
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
* keywords: => 2.0
* needs_better_patch: 0 => 1
* stage: Unreviewed => Someday/Maybe
--
Ticket URL: <https://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/24499#comment:4>
Django
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Reporter: timgraham | Owner: timgraham
Type: | Status: new
Cleanup/optimization |
Component: GIS | Version: master
Keywords: 2.0 | Triage Stage:
| Someday/Maybe
Needs tests: 0 | Patch needs improvement: 1
Easy pickings: 0 | UI/UX: 0
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Comment (by claudep):
You could ask on the Geodjango ML if withdrawal of PostGIS 1.5 from Django
1.9 would hurt anyone.
--
Ticket URL: <https://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/24499#comment:5>
Django
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Reporter: timgraham | Owner: timgraham
Type: | Status: new
Cleanup/optimization |
Component: GIS | Version: master
Keywords: 2.0 | Triage Stage:
| Someday/Maybe
Needs tests: 0 | Patch needs improvement: 0
Easy pickings: 0 | UI/UX: 0
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
* needs_better_patch: 1 => 0
Comment:
[https://groups.google.com/d/topic/geodjango/E2ZWIKeq24c/discussion No
replies in 7 days] although the post has 7 views according to Google
groups. Should we try any harder to get feedback? I think we should be
somewhat free to drop older technologies, particularly since 1.8 is LTS.
--
Ticket URL: <https://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/24499#comment:6>
Django
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Reporter: timgraham | Owner: timgraham
Type: | Status: new
Cleanup/optimization |
Component: GIS | Version: master
Keywords: 2.0 | Triage Stage:
| Someday/Maybe
Needs tests: 0 | Patch needs improvement: 0
Easy pickings: 0 | UI/UX: 0
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Comment (by claudep):
We are talking about dropping it for 1.9, not 1.8, right? I would be
strongly -1 to drop it in 1.8.
--
Ticket URL: <https://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/24499#comment:7>
Django
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Reporter: timgraham | Owner: timgraham
Type: | Status: new
Cleanup/optimization |
Component: GIS | Version: master
Keywords: 2.0 | Triage Stage:
| Someday/Maybe
Needs tests: 0 | Patch needs improvement: 0
Easy pickings: 0 | UI/UX: 0
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Comment (by aaugustin):
Yes, we're talking about dropping it from 1.9. The impact on users is
lessened because 1.8 is LTS.
--
Ticket URL: <https://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/24499#comment:8>
Django
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Reporter: timgraham | Owner: timgraham
Type: | Status: new
Cleanup/optimization |
Component: GIS | Version: master
Keywords: 2.0 | Triage Stage:
| Someday/Maybe
Needs tests: 0 | Patch needs improvement: 0
Easy pickings: 0 | UI/UX: 0
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Comment (by claudep):
Ah, sorry. I misunderstood the comment.
--
Ticket URL: <https://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/24499#comment:9>
Django
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Reporter: timgraham | Owner: timgraham
Type: | Status: new
Cleanup/optimization |
Component: GIS | Version: master
Keywords: | Triage Stage: Accepted
Has patch: 1 | Needs documentation: 0
Needs tests: 0 | Patch needs improvement: 0
Easy pickings: 0 | UI/UX: 0
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
* keywords: 2.0 =>
* stage: Someday/Maybe => Accepted
--
Ticket URL: <https://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/24499#comment:10>
Django
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Reporter: timgraham | Owner: timgraham
Type: | Status: new
Cleanup/optimization |
Component: GIS | Version: master
Keywords: | Triage Stage: Ready for
| checkin
Has patch: 1 | Needs documentation: 0
Needs tests: 0 | Patch needs improvement: 0
Easy pickings: 0 | UI/UX: 0
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
* stage: Accepted => Ready for checkin
Comment:
Patch looks good per Claude, but I'm going to try to put together
something like a docker config to ease testing on newer versions of
PostGIS since Claude's system (Debian stable) includes 1.5 and he is our
main contributor.
--
Ticket URL: <https://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/24499#comment:11>
Django
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Reporter: timgraham | Owner: timgraham
Type: | Status: new
Cleanup/optimization |
Component: GIS | Version: master
Keywords: | Triage Stage: Ready for
| checkin
Needs tests: 0 | Patch needs improvement: 0
Easy pickings: 0 | UI/UX: 0
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Comment (by claudep):
Thanks /o\
--
Ticket URL: <https://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/24499#comment:12>
Django
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Reporter: timgraham | Owner: timgraham
Cleanup/optimization |
Component: GIS | Version: master
Keywords: | Triage Stage: Ready for
| checkin
Needs tests: 0 | Patch needs improvement: 0
Easy pickings: 0 | UI/UX: 0
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
* status: new => closed
* resolution: => fixed
Comment:
In [changeset:"26996e2d55719deb0a0b85c642c88658c929106c" 26996e2d]:
{{{
#!CommitTicketReference repository=""
revision="26996e2d55719deb0a0b85c642c88658c929106c"
Fixed #24499 -- Dropped support for PostGIS 1.5.
}}}
--
Ticket URL: <https://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/24499#comment:13>
Django
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Reporter: timgraham | Owner: timgraham
Cleanup/optimization |
Component: GIS | Version: master
Keywords: | Triage Stage: Ready for
| checkin
Needs tests: 0 | Patch needs improvement: 0
Easy pickings: 0 | UI/UX: 0
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Comment (by Tim Graham <timograham@…>):
In [changeset:"ab873e7a681e62d6803a3c04a051a47335f7b93a" ab873e7]:
{{{
#!CommitTicketReference repository=""
revision="ab873e7a681e62d6803a3c04a051a47335f7b93a"
Refs #24499 -- Removed an obsolete test check for PostGIS 1.5.
}}}
--
Ticket URL: <https://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/24499#comment:14>
Django
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Reporter: timgraham | Owner: timgraham
Cleanup/optimization |
Component: GIS | Version: master
Keywords: | Triage Stage: Ready for
| checkin
Needs tests: 0 | Patch needs improvement: 0
Easy pickings: 0 | UI/UX: 0
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Comment (by Tim Graham <timograham@…>):
In [changeset:"703369fb25ad0cc8db844127085a3ae76260dab3" 703369f]:
{{{
#!CommitTicketReference repository=""
revision="703369fb25ad0cc8db844127085a3ae76260dab3"
[1.9.x] Refs #24499 -- Removed an obsolete test check for PostGIS 1.5.
Backport of ab873e7a681e62d6803a3c04a051a47335f7b93a from master
}}}
--
Ticket URL: <https://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/24499#comment:15>