--
Ticket URL: <https://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/26567>
Django <https://code.djangoproject.com/>
The Web framework for perfectionists with deadlines.
* needs_better_patch: => 0
* needs_docs: => 0
* needs_tests: => 0
Old description:
> In multiple places, the docs reference
> [https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc2616 RFC 2616], which has been obsoleted
> by RFCs [https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7230 7230] through
> [https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7235 7235].
New description:
In multiple places, the docs and code comments reference
[https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc2616 RFC 2616], which has been obsoleted
by RFCs [https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7230 7230] through
[https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7235 7235].
--
--
Ticket URL: <https://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/26567#comment:1>
* status: new => assigned
* owner: nobody => vfaronov
Comment:
Fixed it on my [https://github.com/vfaronov/django/tree/ticket_26567
vfaronov:ticket_26567] branch. Didn’t touch comments where it was not
obvious that the code adhered to the newer standard.
--
Ticket URL: <https://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/26567#comment:2>
* has_patch: 0 => 1
* stage: Unreviewed => Accepted
--
Ticket URL: <https://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/26567#comment:3>
* status: assigned => closed
* resolution: => fixed
Comment:
In [changeset:"ac77c55bc5fc54cd763a7ae426784650a8cc97c9" ac77c55]:
{{{
#!CommitTicketReference repository=""
revision="ac77c55bc5fc54cd763a7ae426784650a8cc97c9"
Fixed #26567 -- Updated references to obsolete RFC2616.
Didn't touch comments where it wasn't obvious that the code adhered to
the newer standard.
}}}
--
Ticket URL: <https://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/26567#comment:4>
Comment (by Tim Graham <timograham@…>):
In [changeset:"cb33e553ee537da4915f9055f8cdf9bf32113aed" cb33e553]:
{{{
#!CommitTicketReference repository=""
revision="cb33e553ee537da4915f9055f8cdf9bf32113aed"
[1.9.x] Fixed #26567 -- Updated references to obsolete RFC2616.
Didn't touch comments where it wasn't obvious that the code adhered to
the newer standard.
Backport of ac77c55bc5fc54cd763a7ae426784650a8cc97c9 from master
}}}
--
Ticket URL: <https://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/26567#comment:5>
Comment (by claudep):
I think the same could be done with RFC 5322 replacing RFC 2822. vfaronov,
up to a similar patch?
--
Ticket URL: <https://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/26567#comment:6>
Comment (by vfaronov):
Replying to [comment:6 claudep]:
> I think the same could be done with RFC 5322 replacing RFC 2822.
vfaronov, up to a similar patch?
Sure. #26580.
--
Ticket URL: <https://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/26567#comment:7>