There could also be an option to highlight only the functions that can be
invoked from templates, in order to support old functionality.
--
Ticket URL: <https://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/24917>
Django <https://code.djangoproject.com/>
The Web framework for perfectionists with deadlines.
* owner: nobody => zanderle
* needs_docs: => 0
* status: new => assigned
* needs_tests: => 0
* needs_better_patch: => 0
--
Ticket URL: <https://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/24917#comment:1>
Comment (by timgraham):
It would be appropriate to raise the issue on the DevelopersMailingList if
you want to revisit this design decision.
--
Ticket URL: <https://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/24917#comment:2>
Comment (by zanderle):
Replying to [comment:2 timgraham]:
> It would be appropriate to raise the issue on the DevelopersMailingList
if you want to revisit this design decision.
I just did. Let me know if there is anything else I can/should do.
--
Ticket URL: <https://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/24917#comment:3>
Comment (by mjtamlyn):
Accepting as I feel the "quick and dirty documentation tool for the whole
dev team" is a more common paradigm than the "documentation tool for
template authors only" one.
If however we do relax this, it opens up questions of what else should be
included in the constructed docs? Forms? Views? URLs? Managers? Tasks?
At this point you're closer to a customised version of Sphinx's autodoc.
--
Ticket URL: <https://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/24917#comment:4>
* stage: Unreviewed => Accepted
--
Ticket URL: <https://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/24917#comment:5>
--
Ticket URL: <https://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/24917#comment:6>
Comment (by zanderle):
Just created a PR https://github.com/django/django/pull/4939
--
Ticket URL: <https://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/24917#comment:7>
* has_patch: 0 => 1
--
Ticket URL: <https://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/24917#comment:8>
* needs_better_patch: 0 => 1
--
Ticket URL: <https://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/24917#comment:9>
* needs_better_patch: 1 => 0
* needs_tests: 0 => 1
--
Ticket URL: <https://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/24917#comment:10>
* needs_tests: 1 => 0
--
Ticket URL: <https://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/24917#comment:11>
* needs_better_patch: 0 => 1
--
Ticket URL: <https://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/24917#comment:12>
* needs_better_patch: 1 => 0
--
Ticket URL: <https://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/24917#comment:13>
* needs_better_patch: 0 => 1
--
Ticket URL: <https://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/24917#comment:14>
* needs_better_patch: 1 => 0
--
Ticket URL: <https://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/24917#comment:15>
* stage: Accepted => Ready for checkin
--
Ticket URL: <https://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/24917#comment:16>
* status: assigned => closed
* resolution: => fixed
Comment:
In [changeset:"f3dc173240d2a91c831b08dd6820e1d83322f3da" f3dc173]:
{{{
#!CommitTicketReference repository=""
revision="f3dc173240d2a91c831b08dd6820e1d83322f3da"
Fixed #24917 -- Made admindocs display model methods that take arguments.
}}}
--
Ticket URL: <https://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/24917#comment:17>
Comment (by Tim Graham <timograham@…>):
In [changeset:"75143fa13f4f1ad2be84a103f7ce0eef9d06d3b4" 75143fa1]:
{{{
#!CommitTicketReference repository=""
revision="75143fa13f4f1ad2be84a103f7ce0eef9d06d3b4"
Fixed #26182 -- Removed an obsolete (refs #24917) paragraph in admindocs.
}}}
--
Ticket URL: <https://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/24917#comment:18>
Comment (by Tim Graham <timograham@…>):
In [changeset:"c5d591733f017447889c6ff71909e06f51779b97" c5d59173]:
{{{
#!CommitTicketReference repository=""
revision="c5d591733f017447889c6ff71909e06f51779b97"
[1.9.x] Fixed #26182 -- Removed an obsolete (refs #24917) paragraph in
admindocs.
Backport of 75143fa13f4f1ad2be84a103f7ce0eef9d06d3b4 from master
}}}
--
Ticket URL: <https://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/24917#comment:19>