I don't think it's a sane situation. We should decide who's responsible
for index creation code and stick with it.
--
Ticket URL: <https://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/28465>
Django <https://code.djangoproject.com/>
The Web framework for perfectionists with deadlines.
* has_patch: 0 => 1
Comment:
[https://github.com/django/django/pull/8850 PR]
--
Ticket URL: <https://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/28465#comment:1>
* stage: Unreviewed => Accepted
Comment:
This is something
[https://github.com/django/django/pull/6643#issuecomment-258646571 I
noticed as well] when working on the deferred references stuff for #25530.
Thanks for tackling it Claude!
--
Ticket URL: <https://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/28465#comment:2>
* stage: Accepted => Ready for checkin
--
Ticket URL: <https://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/28465#comment:3>
* status: new => closed
* resolution: => fixed
Comment:
In [changeset:"831358f23d545b8dba017c6b26bd295ba9f6c17d" 831358f]:
{{{
#!CommitTicketReference repository=""
revision="831358f23d545b8dba017c6b26bd295ba9f6c17d"
Fixed #28465 -- Unified index SQL creation in DatabaseSchemaEditor
Thanks Tim Graham for the review.
}}}
--
Ticket URL: <https://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/28465#comment:4>