--
Ticket URL: <https://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/27784>
Django <https://code.djangoproject.com/>
The Web framework for perfectionists with deadlines.
Comment (by Massimo Scamarcia):
Pull Request: https://github.com/django/django/pull/7961
Should I push to ticket_27784 instead?
--
Ticket URL: <https://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/27784#comment:1>
* status: new => closed
* resolution: => duplicate
Comment:
Duplicate of #22779. The latest [https://groups.google.com/d/topic/django-
developers/OGOf1TfSBBs/discussion discussion on the mailing list]
suggested replacing the model with settings may be a better approach.
--
Ticket URL: <https://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/27784#comment:2>
Comment (by Massimo Scamarcia):
Replying to [comment:2 Tim Graham]:
> Duplicate of #22779. The latest [https://groups.google.com/d/topic
/django-developers/OGOf1TfSBBs/discussion discussion on the mailing list]
suggested replacing the model with settings may be a better approach.
I personally dislike the settings based solutions as there are many
pluggable apps and projects that are importing Site directly from
django.contrib.sites.models. imho this feature should work exactly like
the customization of django.contrib.auth.models.User.
--
Ticket URL: <https://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/27784#comment:3>
Comment (by Tim Graham):
You should continue the discussion on the mailing list. We won't make a
change either way without a consensus there.
--
Ticket URL: <https://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/27784#comment:4>
Comment (by Massimo Scamarcia):
Replying to [comment:4 Tim Graham]:
> You should continue the discussion on the mailing list. We won't make a
change either way without a consensus there.
Ok thanks, I will do.
--
Ticket URL: <https://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/27784#comment:5>