If the ticket description was ever changed, then the subject is "Re:
[Django] #ID: {current summary (was: {old summary})".
On such occasions the "(was: {old summary})" part shall not be sent as it
only clutters the email.
--
Ticket URL: <https://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/29240>
Django <https://code.djangoproject.com/>
The Web framework for perfectionists with deadlines.
* status: new => closed
* resolution: => invalid
Comment:
Whether or not the `"(was: {old summary})"` cluters or not the email is up
for debate but in all cases this should be reported to the Trac project.
--
Ticket URL: <https://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/29240#comment:1>
* status: closed => new
* resolution: invalid =>
Comment:
Do I have also to report to Trac, that whenever I use the function
"Replace existing attachment of the same name" I get two emails:
* one stating that the attachment was removed, containing the
aforementioned "(was: ...)" part in the subject
* one stating that an attachment was added, without the "(was: ...)" in
the subject
while I want to get for this operation in total one email?
--
Ticket URL: <https://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/29240#comment:2>
* status: new => closed
* resolution: => invalid
Comment:
Probably. The only part of this bug tracker that we have control over is
in https://github.com/django/code.djangoproject.com/ and bug reports that
affect that repository should be reported there rather than here.
--
Ticket URL: <https://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/29240#comment:3>
Comment (by Дилян Палаузов):
Upstream report: https://trac.edgewall.org/ticket/12997
--
Ticket URL: <https://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/29240#comment:4>