leaving any downstream caller to do the `reversed(modules)` call
themselves, should they need to. Arguably they might not need/want a list
anyway...
Patch will come to demonstrate that with the adjustment of the single test
everything should be OK to consider removing it. The test would pass
whether or not I reverse the output, but I'm opting to keep intent of the
test method the same...
--
Ticket URL: <https://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/32941>
Django <https://code.djangoproject.com/>
The Web framework for perfectionists with deadlines.
Comment (by Keryn Knight):
PR is here: https://github.com/django/django/pull/14659
Awaiting CI results to see whether or not it ''could'' move to accepted.
--
Ticket URL: <https://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/32941#comment:1>
* stage: Unreviewed => Accepted
Comment:
Accepting as `get_format_modules()` is undocumented so I don't have any
concerns about backward compatibility.
--
Ticket URL: <https://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/32941#comment:2>
Comment (by Chris Jerdonek):
FYI, #15129 added a regression test to fix a bug when passing
`reverse=True`.
--
Ticket URL: <https://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/32941#comment:3>
* owner: nobody => Keryn Knight
* status: new => assigned
--
Ticket URL: <https://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/32941#comment:4>
Comment (by Nick Pope):
I tracked it down - the `reverse` argument has been unused since
0d8b523422fda71baa10807d5aebefd34bad7962.
--
Ticket URL: <https://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/32941#comment:5>
* status: assigned => closed
* resolution: => fixed
Comment:
In [changeset:"59942a66ceb79868cb91844df3a72a24c63e39fa" 59942a66]:
{{{
#!CommitTicketReference repository=""
revision="59942a66ceb79868cb91844df3a72a24c63e39fa"
Fixed #32941 -- Removed get_format_modules()'s unused reverse argument.
Unused since 0d8b523422fda71baa10807d5aebefd34bad7962.
}}}
--
Ticket URL: <https://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/32941#comment:6>