[Django] #35939: Reference documentation for auth.Permission should link to ContentType
13 views
Skip to first unread message
Django
unread,
Nov 25, 2024, 1:22:57 PM11/25/24
Reply to author
Sign in to reply to author
Forward
Sign in to forward
Delete
You do not have permission to delete messages in this group
Copy link
Report message
Show original message
Either email addresses are anonymous for this group or you need the view member email addresses permission to view the original message
to django-...@googlegroups.com
#35939: Reference documentation for auth.Permission should link to ContentType
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Reporter: Baptiste Mispelon | Type:
| Cleanup/optimization
Status: new | Component:
| Documentation
Version: 5.1 | Severity: Normal
Keywords: | Triage Stage:
| Unreviewed
Has patch: 0 | Needs documentation: 0
Needs tests: 0 | Patch needs improvement: 0
Easy pickings: 1 | UI/UX: 0
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
The reference documentation for `Permission.content_type` [1] [2]
describes the field as:
> A reference to the django_content_type database table, which contains a
record for each installed model.
This seems to me like a more complicated way of saying "A foreign key to
the ContentType model". On top of that, it would be useful if either the
old wording ("django_content_type table") or the new one ("ContentType
model") could link to the reference documentation of the model [3]
You do not have permission to delete messages in this group
Copy link
Report message
Show original message
Either email addresses are anonymous for this group or you need the view member email addresses permission to view the original message
to django-...@googlegroups.com
#35939: Reference documentation for auth.Permission should link to ContentType
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Reporter: Baptiste Mispelon | Owner: Brock
Type: | Smickley