#35831: Include ModelForm and its Meta options in reference docs
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Reporter: jernwerber | Owner:
Type: | jernwerber
Cleanup/optimization | Status: assigned
Component: Documentation | Version:
Severity: Normal | Resolution:
Keywords: | Triage Stage: Accepted
Has patch: 0 | Needs documentation: 0
Needs tests: 0 | Patch needs improvement: 0
Easy pickings: 0 | UI/UX: 0
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Comment (by jernwerber):
Yep, that makes sense. I've structured by going through the possible/valid
attributes for `ModelFormOptions` and detailing what each would
accept/expect and the kinds of errors one might expect to see if something
goes wrong.
I wasn't sure where to situate it in the docs since "models.txt" is
already taken by the `modelform_factory` and `modelformset_factory` docs
so for now I just put it under its own thing.
I've done a first pass, here:
https://github.com/jernwerber/django/blob
/docs-modelform-meta/docs/ref/forms/modelform-meta.txt, but before doing
some of the formatting (like breaking lines at 80 characters) and making a
PR, is there a (non-PR) workflow for this to be reviewed?
Replying to [comment:2 Clifford Gama]:
> Hi @jernwerber, and thanks for taking the time to create this ticket.
>
> I agree. The reference for `ModelForm` and the `Meta` options should be
[
https://docs.djangoproject.com/en/dev/ref/forms/models/ here]. Although
I'm not sure how much we should include there given most of the
information is covered in the topic. I think we should start with the
signatures, descriptions and the list of Meta options along with what they
do.
--
Ticket URL: <
https://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/35831#comment:4>
Django <
https://code.djangoproject.com/>
The Web framework for perfectionists with deadlines.