Suggested example usage (I know that a string can't be a signal sender,
this is just for illustrating the point):
{{{#!python
from django.core.management import signals
def handle_pre(sender, instance):
instance.stdout.write('Hello World')
def handle_post(sender, instance):
instance.stdout.write('Bye World')
signals.pre_command.connect(handle_pre, sender='runserver')
signals.post_command.connect(handle_post, sender='runsever')
}}}
Reasoning:
Currently overriding of commands in Django can only be achieved by
shadowing existing commands using `INSTALLED_APPS` initialization order.
This is a perfectly good solution if a user needs to completely override a
command, but it's not ideal for extending/adding functionality to existing
commands. Extending the same command from different apps will not work as
only the extended command from the latest `INSTALLED_APPS` entry will run
(see Example 2).
Some examples of actions that can be achieved using singals:
1. Pulling remote translations before `compilemessages`.
2. Showing coverage or/and generating xml report after `test`.
3. Running optipng on collected static images after `collectstatic`
4. Displaying useful information like outdated package versions before
`runserver`.
--
Ticket URL: <https://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/27747>
Django <https://code.djangoproject.com/>
The Web framework for perfectionists with deadlines.
* stage: Unreviewed => Someday/Maybe
Comment:
I'd like to see a consensus on the DevelopersMailingList before accepting
this feature. Adam already [https://groups.google.com/d/msg/django-
developers/JwYKEemPHFs/zC-Xe_ycBAAJ offered an opinion], "If there are
other use cases I think they'd also normally be better handled by more
specific signals, e.g. post_migrate, rather than a generic all-commands
signal." but this should be proposed on a separate thread.
--
Ticket URL: <https://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/27747#comment:1>
Comment (by Matthew Schinckel):
The one I have in mind is being able to fire off a seperate process when
starting `runserver` (for instance, to make sure that our JS build pathway
stuff has a "watch" server running).
--
Ticket URL: <https://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/27747#comment:2>
Comment (by Carlton Gibson):
For runserver, in particular, I'm suspecting that, at this late stage,
they'll be some kind of rewrite making it async, to use presumably
asyncio. The autoreloader in the particular seems to be crying out for
this... As such, I'd suggesting adding functionality as part of that to
control subprocesses (or whatever else) rather than using signals.
--
Ticket URL: <https://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/27747#comment:3>