Comment (by Lily Foote):
The forum discussion suggested that `query_params` is the most consistent
with similar apis in Django. I'd go with that.
--
Ticket URL: <https://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/14611#comment:10>
Django <https://code.djangoproject.com/>
The Web framework for perfectionists with deadlines.
* status: closed => new
* needs_docs: 1 => 0
* resolution: wontfix =>
* needs_tests: 1 => 0
Comment:
Accepted based on the forum discussion.
--
Ticket URL: <https://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/14611#comment:11>
* owner: nobody => Tom Carrick
* status: new => assigned
--
Ticket URL: <https://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/14611#comment:12>
* has_patch: 0 => 1
Comment:
[https://github.com/django/django/pull/17447 PR]
--
Ticket URL: <https://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/14611#comment:13>
* needs_better_patch: 0 => 1
Comment:
We need to decide what to do with `get()` and `head()`.
--
Ticket URL: <https://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/14611#comment:14>
* needs_better_patch: 1 => 0
* stage: Accepted => Ready for checkin
--
Ticket URL: <https://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/14611#comment:15>
* status: assigned => closed
* resolution: => fixed
Comment:
In [changeset:"a03593967f098cf8dab79065bcabbcebd461f05b" a0359396]:
{{{
#!CommitTicketReference repository=""
revision="a03593967f098cf8dab79065bcabbcebd461f05b"
Fixed #14611 -- Added query_params argument to RequestFactory and Client
classes.
}}}
--
Ticket URL: <https://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/14611#comment:16>