Re: [Django] #34260: models.FloatField documentation doesn't mention that +inf, -inf, and NaN are database-dependent. (was: models.FloatField documentation doesn't mention that +inf, -inf, and NaN are invalid.)

2 views
Skip to first unread message

Django

unread,
Jan 16, 2023, 7:43:34 AM1/16/23
to django-...@googlegroups.com
#34260: models.FloatField documentation doesn't mention that +inf, -inf, and NaN
are database-dependent.
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Reporter: Matt Cooper | Owner: nobody
Type: | Status: new
Cleanup/optimization |
Component: Documentation | Version: 4.1
Severity: Normal | Resolution:
Keywords: floatfield | Triage Stage:
| Unreviewed
Has patch: 0 | Needs documentation: 0
Needs tests: 0 | Patch needs improvement: 0
Easy pickings: 1 | UI/UX: 0
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Description changed by Matt Cooper:

Old description:

> The model field reference documentation doesn't mention that, in a
> FloatField, the values must pass `math.isfinite`. This excludes
> `float('inf')` (positive and negative) and `float('nan')`. I saw old
> discussion about why this is the case, but only after being bitten by it
> in a project. I'd like to submit a patch adding this info to the docs.

New description:

The model field reference documentation doesn't mention that, in a
FloatField, non-numeric values have database-dependent behavior.
`float('nan')` on SQLite requires the field to be nullable, for example. I
saw old discussion about why this is the case, but only after being bitten
by it in a project. I'd like to submit a patch adding this info to the
docs.

--

--
Ticket URL: <https://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/34260#comment:5>
Django <https://code.djangoproject.com/>
The Web framework for perfectionists with deadlines.

Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages