https://github.com/django/django/pull/16438
--
Ticket URL: <https://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/34247>
Django <https://code.djangoproject.com/>
The Web framework for perfectionists with deadlines.
* needs_tests: 0 => 1
* easy: 1 => 0
Comment:
You'll need to provide a minimal example to reproduce the issue so we can
better understand it. The patch also requires a regression test based on
that.
--
Ticket URL: <https://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/34247#comment:1>
* status: new => closed
* resolution: => needsinfo
--
Ticket URL: <https://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/34247#comment:2>
Comment (by Mike Schem):
Replying to [comment:1 Tim Graham]:
> You'll need to provide a minimal example to reproduce the issue so we
can better understand it. The patch also requires a regression test based
on that.
Yea, I've tried to come up with something, but no luck so far. I've only
been able to get this to fail on my project, and like I said, it has
hundreds of objects with complex relations. The code does fix the problem
and I see no downside to ordering proxy model and model creates at the top
before the sort, any reason not to just accept the PR?
Not sure if I'll be able to come up with something here.
--
Ticket URL: <https://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/34247#comment:3>
Comment (by Tim Graham):
We can't add code for a problem we don't fully understand, or else Django
would quickly become a mess. Without a test, we can't be sure the problem
is fixed and that the behavior won't regress in the future.
--
Ticket URL: <https://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/34247#comment:4>