Psycopg3 Redesign

129 views
Skip to first unread message

Asif Saif Uddin

unread,
Mar 11, 2020, 4:28:27 AM3/11/20
to Django developers (Contributions to Django itself)
Hi,

As this library is used by django, I thought it would be good to share with django internals deveopers?


Hope it is useful.

./auvipy

Jure Erznožnik

unread,
Mar 11, 2020, 5:39:57 AM3/11/20
to django-d...@googlegroups.com

His proposed changes look awesome to me!

IMHO, the biggest issue going async with current implementation was connection pooling for async code. I feared that we might need huge numbers of connections in certain scenarios, especially if the code required altering the connections themselves. The proposed changes look like they eliminate the issue altogether and I'm not referring to direct async support alone.

LP,
Jure

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django developers (Contributions to Django itself)" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to django-develop...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/django-developers/faea6068-ec43-4da6-9780-1beaedaf0b16%40googlegroups.com.

Andrew Godwin

unread,
Mar 11, 2020, 11:06:21 AM3/11/20
to Django developers (Contributions to Django itself)
I am particularly excited for native async support arriving - that's something I'd love to have and ship support for from our side when it's done. The rest looks quite sensible too.

Andrew

Asif Saif Uddin

unread,
Apr 1, 2020, 7:34:52 AM4/1/20
to Django developers (Contributions to Django itself)

On Wednesday, March 11, 2020 at 9:06:21 PM UTC+6, Andrew Godwin wrote:
I am particularly excited for native async support arriving - that's something I'd love to have and ship support for from our side when it's done. The rest looks quite sensible too.

Andrew

On Wed, Mar 11, 2020 at 3:39 AM Jure Erznožnik <jure.e...@gmail.com> wrote:

His proposed changes look awesome to me!

IMHO, the biggest issue going async with current implementation was connection pooling for async code. I feared that we might need huge numbers of connections in certain scenarios, especially if the code required altering the connections themselves. The proposed changes look like they eliminate the issue altogether and I'm not referring to direct async support alone.

LP,
Jure


On 11/03/2020 09:28, Asif Saif Uddin wrote:
Hi,

As this library is used by django, I thought it would be good to share with django internals deveopers?


Hope it is useful.

./auvipy
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django developers (Contributions to Django itself)" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to django-d...@googlegroups.com.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django developers (Contributions to Django itself)" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to django-d...@googlegroups.com.
Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages