Hey, I'd actually be really interested in that as well. I'm actually low on certain pituitary peptide hormones and although thankfully it didn't affect the development of important organs, it has had a noticeable physical and mental impact.
I was looking at some journal papers having to do with androgen insensitivity and 5-alpha-reductase mutations, though based on some blood-work, that might not be the issue.
I spent an hour sifting through the NCBI database looking at the corresponding genes, and looked through the corresponding papers, but never found the primers they kept saying they were using. Never found supplemental information either.
Karyotyping is expensive and from what my endocrinologist said, is only warranted in certain cases when things like Kallman's or Kleinfelter's syndrome is a potential diagnosis. There are similar conditions in females, but the name escapes me.
Though my experience wasn't as horrendous as some other people's accounts I've read, finding an endo that will thoroughly investigate hormone problems relating to sex hormones is hard.
Steroids have such a bad rap that few doctors will treat males in the low-normal range, and even fewer will try to do Clomid HPTA restarts or use recombinant hCG for leydig cell stimulation. I'm actually going to be investing some $ into RPRX which is in Phase 3 trials of the single isomer from clomiphene citrate (Androxal) to help boost T levels naturally without estrogen side effects from the normal Clomid which has both antagonistic and agonistic properties.
I've actually become pretty obsessed with the endocrine system because of everything I've been going through, and trying to think up better ways to do testing.
Right now, immunoassays are generally used for a lot of hormone panels, and while LCMS-MS is more sensitive and accurate, it is more expensive. There are variations in any analytical testing, and basing a potential life-long treatment off ONE panel is a terrible idea. It's just a "snap shot" of your endocrine system.
Also, you can get private blood-work done in EVERY STATE IN THE US Except Massachusetts (where I live) and one other state which I can't remember.
Fuck me for wanting to be pro-active about my health right?
After reaching out and finding many forums, I've come across a lot of people that feel quite dissatisfied with the way their treatment for certain conditions is handled. Medicine is complex and there isn't always a smoking gun, but having access to cheaper blood testing and potential DNA tests could allow for the acquisition of a larger data set, versus 1 or 2 blood tests and then, here inject this for the rest of your life!
I also took a shitload of corticosteroids when I had mono-nucleosis as a kid for a month and ever since my adrenals have always shown high-outside of range levels of cortisol and ATHC.
So....yeah...things can get very complicated very quickly.
I do continue to read about potential genes to be sequenced from my own genome, as I feel like that might be more "definitive" than one or two blood tests, but so far I've found it hard to find the corresponding genes, and data representing "normal" and "mutant".
I'll admit i didn't look very hard though as I've been busy with other things.
I guess it's wierd saying that all over the internet and knock on wood it never comes back to bite me in the ass! But hey, we all have something off with us, and we're just a big ol sack of chemicals and feedback loops, so if we have the knowledge, I say go for it when it comes to finding better ways to test or diagnose certain conditions.
Obviously, still consult a doctor, but knowledge is power. And the more data and knowledge we can gather before putting someone on pharmaceuticals for long periods of time, the better.