--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Dixonary" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to dixonary+u...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/dixonary/4b5a6c77-e470-5597-f95b-fbc87956e650%40siam.co.uk.
Tim – I’d go further. As an American, I would always use the first option. The second option is neither grammatically correct, although I don’t have the technical vocabulary to explain exactly why it isn’t, nor idiomatic.
Alan
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/dixonary/CANeWAQcH_AmCaSvMpty7r22a8EW8HNxpoJW13p5yHoyGp%2BeOWw%40mail.gmail.com.
I would've used the first option but I could've used the second
option - could've now being the standard abbreviation for 'could
of' which appals me as meaningless
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Dixonary" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to dixonary+u...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/dixonary/879d048a-c877-b7cd-2b9a-e9a405472804%40john-barrs.co.uk.
might've been
Is this a case of "would've could've should've?"
Very unhealthy.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Dixonary" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to dixonary+u...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/dixonary/d0c706f2-b6b8-467d-9ff3-e67eea99762an%40googlegroups.com.