Question

閲覧: 3 回
最初の未読メッセージにスキップ

Judy Madnick

未読、
2019/11/17 11:31:182019/11/17
To: dixo...@googlegroups.com
So far no one has addressed my question:
 
Do I tell a submitter that I've combined his or her definition with another? If the definitions aren't exactly the same but too similar to separate them, how do I decide how to combine them? This is a new issue for me!
 
Judy

France International/Mike Shefler

未読、
2019/11/17 11:33:142019/11/17
To: dixo...@googlegroups.com
I do not tell them this has happened until after voting is closed. I don't see any need to do so before that.

--Mike
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Dixonary" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to dixonary+u...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/dixonary/100107B80B110B1F12EC003006%40LAPTOP-NG0A64CK.

Judy Madnick

未読、
2019/11/17 11:44:182019/11/17
To: dixo...@googlegroups.com
Thank you. Now to figure out how to handle the wording. <sigh> Always a new issue!
 
Judy
 

Original message
From: "France International/Mike Shefler" <sta...@salsgiver.com>
To: dixo...@googlegroups.com;
Dated: 11/17/2019 11:33:28 AM
Subject: Re: [Dixonary] Question

France International/Mike Shefler

未読、
2019/11/17 11:55:062019/11/17
To: dixo...@googlegroups.com
Combining defs is always optional.

Efrem Mallach

未読、
2019/11/17 12:00:122019/11/17
To: dixo...@googlegroups.com
Unless the two are identical word for word. The rules leave no wiggle room in that unlikely case. 

FWIW, I’ve never told people, but I tend to be conservative in combining so they’ve always (AFAIK) been able to figure it out. 

Efrem 

Sent from my iPhone

Daniel B Widdis

未読、
2019/11/17 12:57:212019/11/17
To: dixo...@googlegroups.com

I usually say so to stave off the “where’s my def?” question when it changes, but I try to do so in a general way “combined with another def” without giving away whether it’s another player or the real one.

--

Judy Madnick

未読、
2019/11/17 13:07:372019/11/17
To: dixo...@googlegroups.com
Dan,
 
So you actually say that two definitions were combined with/without indicating which definition is that combination?  (That's two questions. LOL!)
 
Judy
 

Original message
From: "Daniel B Widdis" <wid...@dixonary.net>
To: dixo...@googlegroups.com;
Dated: 11/17/2019 12:57:18 PM
Subject: Re: [Dixonary] Question

I usually say so to stave off the “where’s my def?” question when it changes, but I try to do so in a general way “combined with another def” without giving away whether it’s another player or the real one.

 

From: on behalf of Judy Madnick
Reply-To:
Date: Sunday, November 17, 2019 at 8:31 AM
To:
Subject: [Dixonary] Question

 

So far no one has addressed my question:

 

Do I tell a submitter that I've combined his or her definition with another? If the definitions aren't exactly the same but too similar to separate them, how do I decide how to combine them? This is a new issue for me!

 

Judy

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Dixonary" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to dixonary+u...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/dixonary/100107B80B110B1F12EC003006%40LAPTOP-NG0A64CK.

 

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Dixonary" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to dixonary+u...@googlegroups.com.

Daniel B Widdis

未読、
2019/11/17 13:23:592019/11/17
To: dixo...@googlegroups.com

If I’ve non-trivially changed someone’s def (usually by adding words to it in combination, or simplifying a lot) I’ll just say, “I’ve combined your def with another similar one.”  Quick and to the point.  They’d figure that much out when the defs were posted anyway, so it’s not like I’m telling them anything.

Judy Madnick

未読、
2019/11/17 13:26:072019/11/17
To: dixo...@googlegroups.com
Sounds like I don't have to say anything at all if I prefer not to. :-)
 
Judy
 

Original message
From: "Daniel B Widdis" <wid...@dixonary.net>
To: dixo...@googlegroups.com;
Dated: 11/17/2019 1:23:56 PM
Subject: Re: [Dixonary] Question

If I’ve non-trivially changed someone’s def (usually by adding words to it in combination, or simplifying a lot) I’ll just say, “I’ve combined your def with another similar one.”  Quick and to the point.  They’d figure that much out when the defs were posted anyway, so it’s not like I’m telling them anything.

 

From: on behalf of Judy Madnick
Reply-To:
Date: Sunday, November 17, 2019 at 10:07 AM
To:
Subject: Re: [Dixonary] Question

 

Dan,

 

So you actually say that two definitions were combined with/without indicating which definition is that combination?  (That's two questions. LOL!)

 

Judy

 

Original message
From: "Daniel B Widdis"

Hugo Kornelis

未読、
2019/11/17 13:34:542019/11/17
To: dixo...@googlegroups.com
You don't, but then you risk a submitter asking "where's my def" on the list.

I would do as Dan says, tell them it's combined "with another def". Regardless of whether that other def is the dictionary or another player's.
And if the changes are such that they might not recogize it, I would include the wording of the combined def in my mail to the submitter(s).

So if you submitted "A foo that can also be used as a bar", I would tell you "Your definition has been combined with another definition; after combining it now reads 'A foo-bar'."
And to the submitter of "A bar that can also be used as a foo", I would send the same message (but as a separate mail, not a single mail to two recipients, since then they would know it was combined with another fake def).

Cheers,
Hugo

Op 17-11-2019 om 19:26 schreef Judy Madnick:

Judy Madnick

未読、
2019/11/17 13:37:032019/11/17
To: dixo...@googlegroups.com
Thanks, Hugo. I don't want to say anymore, but when the round is over, I can explain further.
 
Judy
 

Original message
From: "Hugo Kornelis" <hu...@perFact.info>
To: dixo...@googlegroups.com;
Dated: 11/17/2019 1:34:51 PM
Subject: Re: [Dixonary] Question

You don't, but then you risk a submitter asking "where's my def" on the list.

I would do as Dan says, tell them it's combined "with another def". Regardless of whether that other def is the dictionary or another player's.
And if the changes are such that they might not recogize it, I would include the wording of the combined def in my mail to the submitter(s).

So if you submitted "A foo that can also be used as a bar", I would tell you "Your definition has been combined with another definition; after combining it now reads 'A foo-bar'."
And to the submitter of "A bar that can also be used as a foo", I would send the same message (but as a separate mail, not a single mail to two recipients, since then they would know it was combined with another fake def).

Cheers,
Hugo

Op 17-11-2019 om 19:26 schreef Judy Madnick:
Sounds like I don't have to say anything at all if I prefer not to. :-)
 
Judy
 

Original message
From: "Daniel B Widdis"
全員に返信
投稿者に返信
転送
新着メール 0 件