It was a close finish with no sure winner until the last vote. The final leader board is
Tim Lodge’s hygge (7), with 5 votes.
Debbie Embler’s niqqud (11), with 4 votes.
Runners up with 2 votes each:
Shani Naylor’s voetsak (5). Had I been playing, I would have voted for it, because the phrasing of the definition made me chuckle: Craigie’s, I think.
Efrem Mallach’s abugida (10).
Tim Bourne’s sheepfold (8).
Nobody guessed the word, but Johnny Barrs knew it and so did not need to guess.
The word shwmae is Welsh in origin. It is a greeting, that for informality, and literal sense, is a close match to South African English howzit. I suspect that comparison dates me badly.
I chose the definition partly because the word doesn’t look Welsh. The spelling is a concession to English when the word is used in an English context, because none of its various spellings in Welsh, siẁmae, s’ma’i, etc, would suggest its South Wales pronunciation /ʃəˈmaɪ/.
I also chose the definition partly for the informality of the phrasing. I truly can’t imagine Murray or Gove writing it that way.
And, if it isn’t now obvious, Welsh 〈w〉 can and often does represent a vowel, giving us the English borrowings cwm ‘cirque’ (a kind of glacial valley) /kʊm/, and crwth ‘fiddle’ /kruːθ/, both of which are acceptable in tournament Scrabble.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Dixonary" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to dixonary+u...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/dixonary/Mailbird-c8929213-6d6b-4a64-a81f-969c019141a8%40boargules.com.
that had me scrambling to check and re-check that I had the author of 9 correct, and that its number in my spreadsheet agreed with published list, and anything else I could think of that I might have got wrong.I don't believe any of these, least of all mine! So I'll reward the authors of the following with my votes: 7 and 9.
On 2026-05-15 12:56:47, Judy Madnick <jmad...@gmail.com> wrote:
I'm not sure how I managed to vote for my own definition. It was unintentional; that's for sure!
--
--
On 2026-05-15 14:19:54, Hugo Kornelis <hu...@perfact.info> wrote:
Congratrulations on your D0
that had me scrambling to check and re-check that I had the author of 9 correct, and that its number in my spreadsheet agreed with published list, and anything else I could think of that I might have got wrong.I don't believe any of these, least of all mine! So I'll reward the authors of the following with my votes: 7 and 9.
On 2026-05-15 12:56:47, Judy Madnick <jmad...@gmail.com> wrote:
I'm not sure how I managed to vote for my own definition. It was unintentional; that's for sure!
On 2026-05-15 12:56:47, Judy Madnick <jmad...@gmail.com> wrote:
I'm not sure how I managed to vote for my own definition. It was unintentional; that's for sure!
