Round 3257 - KAKAKI - RESULTS

[Judy Madnick]

 

Deborah Fein, with 4 points for her "fishy" definition, is the next dealer. Here are the results in table form as a .jpg and also attached as a .pdf file. John Barrs was the only DQ, and Dan Widdis received 2 dealer points because I thought his definition was a joke. 😲 

I sure am happy to have this round over!

 

P.S. If there's a DQ, can you still have a D0...or is that my reward for not having a nervous breakdown? 😁 (And if I screwed up anything, I'm not sure I want to know about it!)

 

 

[Shani Naylor]

Well done Judy for the D0 (of course you can claim it) and top marks for persisting in frustrating circumstances. 

Well done Deb - this will be your first deal!

And can we please see Dan's def...

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Dixonary" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to dixonary+u...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/dixonary/028ADB330608133B3A34001002%40LAPTOP-NG0A64CK.

[Chowie]

Congrats, Deb!!

To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/dixonary/CAH53O2ccfOvE5vcwu3v_fMefb4dGZeCQ16mbVKHetdGt2UNcww%40mail.gmail.com.

[Judy Madnick]

This might surprise you (ha, ha!) but I've deleted every message that had anything to do with KAKAKI! But I'll bet Dan has it!

 

Judy

---

Original Message

From: "Shani Naylor" <shani....@gmail.com>

To: dixo...@googlegroups.com;

Date: 6/8/2022 8:27:44 PM

Subject: Re: [Dixonary] Round 3257 - KAKAKI - RESULTS

[Daniel B Widdis]

The full submission, including a comment at the top that may have thrown Judy off.  Which maybe I should have submitted for the next woid. 😊

 

Given the earlier discussion of longer defs getting more votes:

 

the inference, or the act of inferring, that what has been observed or established in respect to a part, individual, or species, may, on the ground of analogy, be affirmed or received of the whole to which it belongs. It ascends from the parts to the whole, and forms, from the general analogy of nature, or special presumptions in the case, conclusions which have greater or less degrees of force, and which may be strengthened or weakened by subsequent experience and experiment. It relates to actual existences, as in physical science or the concerns of life.

To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/dixonary/02BA76C3060814333A3600600C%40LAPTOP-NG0A64CK.

[Shani Naylor]

I would have voted for it - it fits kakaki perfectly!

To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/dixonary/BBDEC5E2-4262-48CC-B3CF-AE888AE2BF52%40dixonary.net.