Infinite Awareness Has No Point of View

[Rani Madhavapeddi]

FYI.

🙏🏻💐💜

https://youtu.be/Eh3NZhGNtWE?si=XpjUIzwy1EcRih13

Rani Madhavapeddi Patel

[Dan Kilpatrick]

Rani, I haven't watched it yet, but is it also all points of view all at once? Infinite points of view, and even each particular one as it occurs? 

None and all, together.... Unfathomable to me, N -Dan

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Diehard Group" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to diehard-grou...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/diehard-group/29AA546B-092B-4943-8684-C4A551FD80DE%40gmail.com.

[Rani Madhavapeddi]

Dan,

Conceptually yes, but as Spira points out can we ever see the whole? And the whole can it see the individual parts other than through the individual self?

He likens it to having an aerial view of earth which misses detail and the detail looking at it and missing the whole.

One can only be open to all possibilities or points of view, can we really understand all points of view? I think in silence nothing matters so you transcend ? 

Rani Madhavapeddi Patel

On Feb 8, 2026, at 8:49 AM, Dan Kilpatrick <kilp...@gmail.com> wrote:



To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/diehard-group/CAGgGDoDgZEjunLDAnWMR3zKECaKmSBqB40WG8ORsn9PiTuzQUA%40mail.gmail.com.

[Dan Kilpatrick]

Rani, it just seems to be a living fact to me. As I mentioned, it is all unfathomable at the same time.

As seen from here,  for now. -Dan

To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/diehard-group/B1AF7FB0-3A46-4990-95D8-58BFB616C811%40gmail.com.

[Rani Madhavapeddi]

Dan,

Ultimately it is what it is for each of us isnt it? 

Love peace and joy 

To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/diehard-group/CAGgGDoAgpNqBPypJX8P0CnFph-vtvXGib%2Bg-tyD4TLBY3A7Zsw%40mail.gmail.com.

[Dan Kilpatrick]

Thanks Rani, I guess what you shared here reflects this very discussion in the link ☺️. It seems impossible to not have a point of view, as human beings. And I guess the point of view here senses there is a looking through all of them all at once that is not localized to any particular one.

One other interesting question comes up right now: is the way we look at all this we discuss here influenced by how our particular lives have moved, their circumstances? I wonder if this doesn't reflect or underlie the richness of the various points of view. What seems interesting to me is the shared exploring that then might flow from all these points of view. As you said earlier I believe, this feels open, a shared exploring not having any sort of endpoint or place to land.    

So maybe this is really pointing to the exploring itself (in real-time) that is actually being explored here, not a point of view......? -Dan

To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/diehard-group/CABEbzzrZ3mn1vkK4H_fz4jUnhOEG9N5_T0ss7tFdfLNiejsfMg%40mail.gmail.com.

[Rani Madhavapeddi]

ISing is the I-sing of life? 

Rani Madhavapeddi Patel

On Feb 8, 2026, at 3:37 PM, Dan Kilpatrick <kilp...@gmail.com> wrote:



To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/diehard-group/CAGgGDoAJgjMc1DCrqNyitGQ6GN_407UL%2BrLQvV-n261FHmB13w%40mail.gmail.com.

[Jeffrey Angelson]

😊

Jeff Angelson

To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/diehard-group/CB24770B-01C6-4C59-B470-BC1D0BF73F85%40gmail.com.

[Rob LO]

Rani, Dan 

<<< ISing is the I-sing of life? >>>

In noticing you wrote that .... 

That reminds me of the first time I noticed, NOTic-ing as

not-I-c-ING sounds like Not I Seeing

But the form is always in All Ways changing 🤔

Bit like THIS <=> SH*T 

Or as Dan wrote 

So maybe this is really pointing to the exploring itself (in real-time) that is actually being explored here, not a point of view......? -Dan

Which  interpretation here reads as THIS, 

itself, Itself, ITSELF

pointing, Pointing, POINTING

etc, Etc, ETC

to, To, TO

source, Source, SOURCE

where the: 

lower case form of a word is ~ the concept idea of what the label points to ... 

the Capitalized first letter form ~ relates to how an individual human form writes, reads or interprets the "concept" as meaning concept¹, concept², çoncept³ which there may be a consensus "of concept"  or not about 🤦‍♂️

The ALL CAPS version points to that ineffable SOURCE [ALL & EVERY POINT OF VIEWing ALL AT ONCE EVERYWHERE (Indrasnet, Bohms Holoflux)

I personally keep a-VOID-dancing around as 

i am, I Am, as ... 

i sense, I Sense a view as

interpreter, Interpreter

Where the INTERPRETER, THIS, SOURCE, ETC, 

already, Already

knows, Knows 

beyond, Beyond

my capacity, My Capacity 

As the 

impersonal, Impersonal 

IMPERSONAL 

like SILENCE

ALREADY HAS 

me, ME

&

i, I

in my finitude, Finitude 

but SOURCE, SILENCE, STILLNESS 

ALREADY, ALWAYS IN ALL WAYS 

has me, Me ... 

in THIS INFINITUDE AS ME, YOU, US, WE as ONE BEYOND UNDERSTANDING

and, so, on, and so on :)

This quote from David Carses Perfect Brilliant Stillness ( resonates for me , Me ) start of Chapter 10 p73*

10. GONE BEYOND

“Gate. Gate. Paragate. Parasamgate. Bodhi. Svaha!”

“Gone. Gone. Gone beyond. Gone, completely, beyond.

Awakening: Svaha!”

– The Heart Sutra

🙏💙🙏

R³ Running, Rambling, Rob

Rob L-O

* PDF available Carse made it Copyright free just ask.

To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/diehard-group/CB24770B-01C6-4C59-B470-BC1D0BF73F85%40gmail.com.

[Rob LO]

So many ideas or "eyed ears"

Like these from Feynman maybe 

https://youtu.be/jfz6E6W9lh8?si=jvD2mJjanIP114v1

🙏💙🙏

Rob L-O

[Rani Madhavapeddi]

By Ising I meant IS ing 

Rani Madhavapeddi Patel

On Feb 8, 2026, at 5:59 PM, Rani Madhavapeddi <rmadha...@gmail.com> wrote:

ISing is the I-sing of life?