The Tigers are having a horrible game and Valdez pitched as badly as he ever has. 10-2 Ted Sox in the 4th inning.
But I just saw what on the video stream looked like a completed amateurish performance by the umpires. Valdez plunked a Red Sox batter on the back (not near his head). After a significant delay, Valdez was ejected. No warning had been issued. Jason Benetti and Andy Dirks said that it appeared that the ejection followed a complaint by the Red Sox, not one decided upon prior to those complaints. There didn't seem to be any reason to believe that hitting the batter was intentional.
This is very unlikely to affect this game, but very much could affect the Tigers bullpen usage for the next few games.
It seems to me that ever since ejections have regularly followed hit batsmen, nearly always with a warning, the application has been massively inconsistent. For one example, I recall a case where it very much appeared that Roger Clemens purposely hit a batter with no consequences whatsoever (and no warning).
I am not arguing that the inconsistency particularly victimizes the Tigers.
I do wish there would be co sequences for the umpires for tossing a pitcher without warning, with no indication that Valdez threw at the batter intentionally, unless the umpires identify a consideration of which I'm unaware. And if the governing consideration was the Red Sox complaining, there ought to be significant adverse consequences for the umpiring crew.
Mike Coveyou