Hello,
I'm wondering, ant0nk tested minimal supplemental logging and raised PR
#230 , then the team added the requirement for table level supplemental logging in
#238 for backwards compatibility reasons.
I think it makes sense to keep backwards compatibility. At the same time, allowing minimal logging could make sense for those cases where the consuming applications aren't interested at the before state. Would it make sense to make it optional with some connector configuration variable?
If it does I'm happy for us to contribute the change and test it.
Martín