deal.ii step-33

[Lore Micalizzi]

Dear deal.ii developers,

I'm Lorenzo, a PhD student in numerical analysis at Universität Zürich.

Recently, deal.ii has been recommended to me by some colleagues.
I found it interesting and I've started playing with it.

I installed it and I tried some tutorial examples which were provided.
I did not try all of them. However, they all seem to work but step-33.
The file is normally compiled but I get an error during the execution.

I'm wondering whether you experienced something similar and could help me.

NB:
-> I installed dealii-9.4.2 (but I don't think this is the problem, it's not too old as a version)
-> My compilation flags fulfill the dependecies of all the steps but 62, 64, 71, 77

I attach
- what's printed in the terminal when I execute step 33, see error.txt
- a quick sketch of what I did to install the library, see installation.txt
- all what has been printed in the shell during the installation, see terminal.txt (I don't know if that can be useful, I did not get any error message)

Thanks in advance and sorry for having bothered you.

Have a nice day,

Lorenzo

[Lore Micalizzi]

I also would like to point out that make test did not spot any problem

Test project /home/lorenzo/Desktop/GIT/dealii_source/build/tests/quick_tests
      Start  1: step.debug
      Start  2: step.release
      Start  3: affinity.debug
      Start  4: mpi.debug
      Start  5: tbb.debug
      Start  6: p4est.debug
      Start  7: step-petsc.debug
      Start  8: step-slepc.debug
 1/19 Test  #3: affinity.debug ...................   Passed   27.24 sec
      Start  9: step-trilinos.debug
 2/19 Test  #5: tbb.debug ........................   Passed   27.24 sec
      Start 10: step-metis.debug
 3/19 Test  #4: mpi.debug ........................   Passed   27.56 sec
      Start 11: lapack.debug
 4/19 Test  #6: p4est.debug ......................   Passed   37.08 sec
      Start 12: umfpack.debug
 5/19 Test  #7: step-petsc.debug .................   Passed   39.04 sec
      Start 13: gsl.debug
 6/19 Test  #8: step-slepc.debug .................   Passed   39.77 sec
      Start 14: hdf5.debug
 7/19 Test  #2: step.release .....................   Passed   44.59 sec
      Start 15: arpack.debug
 8/19 Test #11: lapack.debug .....................   Passed   25.24 sec
      Start 16: assimp.debug
 9/19 Test #14: hdf5.debug .......................   Passed   14.94 sec
      Start 17: scalapack.debug
10/19 Test  #1: step.debug .......................   Passed   54.74 sec
      Start 18: boost_zlib.debug
11/19 Test #13: gsl.debug ........................   Passed   17.95 sec
      Start 19: gmsh.debug
12/19 Test #10: step-metis.debug .................   Passed   32.16 sec
13/19 Test  #9: step-trilinos.debug ..............   Passed   39.74 sec
14/19 Test #12: umfpack.debug ....................   Passed   34.97 sec
15/19 Test #16: assimp.debug .....................   Passed   23.83 sec
16/19 Test #18: boost_zlib.debug .................   Passed   23.89 sec
17/19 Test #15: arpack.debug .....................   Passed   35.10 sec
18/19 Test #19: gmsh.debug .......................   Passed   22.70 sec
19/19 Test #17: scalapack.debug ..................   Passed   25.61 sec

100% tests passed, 0 tests failed out of 19

Total Test time (real) =  80.35 sec
Built target test

[Wells, David]

Hi Lorenzo,

What an interesting coincidence - I saw a student show me the same error message last week. This is definitely a bug in deal.II!

Best,

David Wells

---

From: dea...@googlegroups.com <dea...@googlegroups.com> on behalf of Lore Micalizzi <lorenzom...@gmail.com>
Sent: Wednesday, March 8, 2023 9:42 AM
To: deal.II User Group <dea...@googlegroups.com>
Subject: [deal.II] Re: deal.ii step-33 tests

 

You don't often get email from lorenzom...@gmail.com. Learn why this is important

--
The deal.II project is located at http://www.dealii.org/
For mailing list/forum options, see https://groups.google.com/d/forum/dealii?hl=en
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "deal.II User Group" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to dealii+un...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/dealii/3b2c446f-166d-413e-9ef5-97df7e437b9cn%40googlegroups.com.

[Lore Micalizzi]

Ok, thanks.

I was driving crazy XD

You received this message because you are subscribed to a topic in the Google Groups "deal.II User Group" group.
To unsubscribe from this topic, visit https://groups.google.com/d/topic/dealii/GCqLvYXaqLk/unsubscribe.
To unsubscribe from this group and all its topics, send an email to dealii+un...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/dealii/MN2PR03MB4879652A92EE10F4AF03838FEDB59%40MN2PR03MB4879.namprd03.prod.outlook.com.

[Wolfgang Bangerth]

Lorenzo:

> Recently, deal.ii has been recommended to me by some colleagues.
> I found it interesting and I've started playing with it.
>
> I installed it and I tried some tutorial examples which were provided.
> I did not try all of them. However, they all seem to work but step-33.
> The file is normally compiled but I get an error during the execution.
>
> I'm wondering whether you experienced something similar and could help me.
>
> NB:
> -> I installed dealii-9.4.2 (but I don't think this is the problem, it's not
> too old as a version)

> -> My compilation flags fulfill the dependecies of all the steps but62, 64, 71, 77

>
> I attach
> - what's printed in the terminal when I execute step 33, see error.txt
> - a quick sketch of what I did to install the library, see installation.txt
> - all what has been printed in the shell during the installation, see
> terminal.txt (I don't know if that can be useful, I did not get any error message)

You may already know this (but I wanted to make sure it's recorded on the
mailing list here): This issue is also recorded in the github issue list at
https://github.com/dealii/dealii/issues/14859

I remember the patch that introduced the assertion having a difficult history,
so I can't give you the hope that this is going to be easy to solve other than
going to an older deal.II version from before the changes that triggered the
issue. At the same time, this is something where we could clearly use some
help as mentioned in the issue linked to above -- if you wanted to help out,
that would be great!

Best
Wolfgang

--
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Wolfgang Bangerth email: bang...@colostate.edu
www: http://www.math.colostate.edu/~bangerth/