FSI with separate grids.

48 views
Skip to first unread message

Tim Braun

unread,
Oct 8, 2024, 12:55:50 PM10/8/24
to deal.II User Group
I am designing a study of elastic responses of structures underwater. An important aspect in calculating vibration is the added mass (effect of accelerating the incompressible fluid around the vibrating object). Instead of using a transient FSI setup, I am seeking to solve the potential flow around the object using a boundary element. The complexity of the boundary element method is higher and utilizes "panels" while I want to stick to linear or quadratic 3d finite elements for the structural elastic deflection.  I would only need the exterior faces to be transferred to the BEM (not to be overly simplistic!) The calculation would need to be coupled such that the potential flow solution updates the solid deflection shape and visa versa.

With all of that wind up, my question is what methods are available for solving by passing solutions between two meshes or perhaps using a connector to map one solution to the other? I suppose I could resort to preCICE but imagine there's a way to run this within a deal ii "program".

I hope my questions are somewhat clear enough, because I'm learning as I go. Any first thoughts are appreciated 

Tim Braun

unread,
Oct 8, 2024, 2:19:00 PM10/8/24
to deal.II User Group
I'll add that I see step-70 as an example, which is time-dependent but does address the coupling process between a solid and fluid. Is that a good place to work from?

Wolfgang Bangerth

unread,
Oct 8, 2024, 7:45:40 PM10/8/24
to dea...@googlegroups.com
On 10/8/24 12:19, Tim Braun wrote:
> **
>
> I'll add that I see step-70 as an example, which is time-dependent but does
> address the coupling process between a solid and fluid. Is that a good place
> to work from?

I would suggest looking through all the programs in the range 60-90. Some of
these use particles to couple problems, and some of them use bulk formulations
of surface processes. I don't know that any of them do *exactly* what you
want, but perhaps you can get inspired by reading through the first page of
the introductions to each of these to see what your options are.

Best
W.

--
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Wolfgang Bangerth email: bang...@colostate.edu
www: http://www.math.colostate.edu/~bangerth/


Luca Heltai

unread,
Oct 9, 2024, 2:26:10 AM10/9/24
to dea...@googlegroups.com
If you want to use BEM, then also take a look at step-34, and at WaveBEM.

Luca

> Il giorno 9 ott 2024, alle ore 01:45, Wolfgang Bangerth <bang...@colostate.edu> ha scritto:
> --
> The deal.II project is located at http://www.dealii.org/
> For mailing list/forum options, see https://groups.google.com/d/forum/dealii?hl=en
> --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "deal.II User Group" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to dealii+un...@googlegroups.com.
> To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/dealii/9c333fad-0d50-4e97-8dfd-4e165c2a408d%40colostate.edu.
Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages