It's certainly possible for someone who owns a small business in Davis Square to work there. In fact, I would say it's almost guaranteed: the nature of small businesses in Davis, with very few even small franchises, means that most people who own a business would work there as well. Allowing someone to fit in both categories means that we would essentially eliminate the worker category as almost every owner would qualify as a worker but not vice-versa. This seems problematic and at-odds with the intent of demographic diversity.
Furthermore, it's inconsistent with my understanding of how the last election was run where there was significant work done to recruit a board member who would fit in the worker category. If we allowed owners to classify as workers, Paul would have already fit that category (as potentially other members would: I imagine Elaine and Jason both work at their businesses in Davis.) To my knowledge, there was no significant rework of the categories themselves in the last round of bylaw amendments, so this precedent should still hold.
Regardless, I hope the election committee can shed some light on this issue either way before voting starts. There's a good chance this has a deciding effect on an election seat, so it's important we understand the criteria before we begin the process.
Ashish