clarification regarding t-values in SmartPLS

[RUPINDER SANDHU]

Good evening to all respected members,

I need clarification regarding mediation (t-values) in SmartPLS 4.

My research topic is - to analyze the relationship between role stress and well-being (organizational commitment, job satisfaction and happiness)... and I am studying the effect of coping as a mediator and employment type as a moderator.

While checking direct and indirect effects (using SmartPLS 4- consistent bootstrapping results), p-values show that effect is significant (<.05).... but t-values are also showing 0.00 values (for each relation)... screen shot is attached herewith...

kindly guide me what this means ??? 

Thanks in advance

Rupinder Kaur

[apeksha hooda]

Dear Scholar,

Chk ur bootstrapping results.

These are NA, means these are not computed.

Chk ur model again and re-run it.

Something is missing. 

There should be some value in sample mean and standard deviation.

Thanks and regards

Apeksha 

Sent from my iPhone

On 20-Sep-2022, at 9:23 PM, RUPINDER SANDHU <roop.sa...@gmail.com> wrote:

Good evening to all respected members,

--
Protocols of this Group:
 
1. Plz search previous post in group before posing the question.
2. Don't write query in someone's post. Always use the option of New topic for the new question. You can do this by writing to dataanalys...@googlegroups.com
3. Its better to give a proper subject to your post/query. It'll help others while searching.
4. Never write Open ended queries. This group intend to help research scholars NOT FOR WORK THEM.
5. Never write words like URGENT in ur posts. People will help them when they are free.
6. Never upload any info about National Seminars/Conferences. Send such info on personal emails. And feel free to share any RESEARCH related info.
7. No Happy New Year, Happy Diwali, Happy Holi, Happy B'day, Happy Anniversary etc. allowed on this group.
8. Few months back there was a facility for asking & sharing the Research Papers. Now there is no provision of asking for the research paper here.
 
Let’s make a better research environment.
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "DataAnalysis" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to dataanalysistrai...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/dataanalysistraining/70219463-45c2-4f51-986b-6a96f28e5613n%40googlegroups.com.

[RUPINDER SANDHU]

Thanks Dr Apeksha for your reply

I tried running the model again... but it is giving same answers under - Consistent Bootstrapping option

I tried checking from internet also. and it is mentioned on SmartPLS site that sometimes this problem occurs. 

It is suggested to open model ECSI and run with 98 observations (screen shot attached).

I tried this solution (ran ECSI model with 98 observations), but it is also giving same n/a kind of values (screen shot attached).

Kindly guide if someone has the solution to this.

Regards,

Rupinder Kaur

[apeksha hooda]

Hi,

What’s your sample size?

And what’s the number of statements in the survey for which u r running PLS?
Thnx 

Sent from my iPhone

On 21-Sep-2022, at 11:28 AM, RUPINDER SANDHU <roop.sa...@gmail.com> wrote:

Thanks Dr Apeksha for your reply

To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/dataanalysistraining/9f6d65cf-9afa-4ea4-a809-04531aae7304n%40googlegroups.com.

[RUPINDER SANDHU]

Hello Dr Apeksha,

My sample comprised of 496 responses from state Department of Agriculture, Punjab.

and total statements are - 85

my measurement model is reflective (screen shot attached for clarity)

Regards,

Rupinder kaur

[Neeraj Kaushik]

Dear Rupinder

I advise you to use Regular PLS instead of consistent PLS.

Best wishes

Neeraj

To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/dataanalysistraining/9e26c89e-529c-4dbd-9694-75134b7fab0en%40googlegroups.com.