Subject: Clarification on Negative Path Coefficient in SEM Model

44 views
Skip to first unread message

Ravinder Pant

unread,
Nov 11, 2025, 6:59:01 AMNov 11
to DataAnalysis
Respected Neeraj Sir and group members,

I hope this message finds you well. I am currently analyzing my structural equation model and have encountered an unexpected result that I would greatly appreciate your insight on.
PFA CFA and Path ANALYSIS  Results.
The path coefficient from 7 → 11 is negative (-0.58), even though, theoretically, the relationship should be positive. Other relationships, such as 7 → 8, 7 → 9, and 7 → 12, are all positive, and these mediators also have positive effects on 11.
I suspect that this negative sign might be due to a suppression effect, given the strong intercorrelations among the mediating variables. However, I would like to confirm whether this interpretation is correct and understand the best way to report it — for instance, whether it would be more appropriate to remove the direct path and present 7s effect on 11 as being fully mediated through 8, 9, and 12.
Could you please advise on how to interpret and handle this situation correctly? I have attached the path diagrams for your reference.
Thank you very much for your time and guidance.
Warm regards,
Ravinder Pant
CFA AND sem Results.docx

Neeraj Kaushik

unread,
Nov 12, 2025, 7:31:21 AMNov 12
to dataanalys...@googlegroups.com
Dear RP
Plz do share the p-value alongwith the beat values.
If p>0.05 then that beta value (irrespective of its sign), shd be considered as zero.
Best wishes

--
The members of this group are expected to follow the following Protocols:
1. Please search previous posts in the group before posting the question.
2. Don't write the query in someone's post. Always use the option of New topic for the new question. You can do this by writing to dataanaly...@googlegroups.com
3. It’s better to give a proper subject to your post/query. It'll help others while searching.
4. Never write Open-ended queries. This group intends to help research scholars, NOT TO WORK FOR THEM.
5. Never write words like URGENT in your posts. People will help when they are free.
6. Never upload any information about National Seminars/Conferences. Send such information
in personal emails and feel free to share any RESEARCH-related information.
7. No Happy New Year, Happy Diwali, Happy Holi, Happy Birthday, Happy Anniversary, etc. allowed in this group.
8. Asking or sharing Research Papers is NOT ALLOWED.
9. You can share your questionnaire only once.
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "DataAnalysis" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to dataanalysistrai...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/dataanalysistraining/99c7bf49-d416-461b-87f6-1d8940ef6ae7n%40googlegroups.com.

Ravinder Pant

unread,
Nov 13, 2025, 3:06:01 AMNov 13
to dataanalys...@googlegroups.com
Respected sir , 
P values and Beta Values are mentioned below

Regression Weights: (Group number 1 - Default model)

Estimate

S.E.

C.R.

P

Label

12

<---

7

.770

.029

26.460

***

par_2

9

<---

7

.713

.029

24.923

***

par_3

8

<---

7

.549

.032

17.025

***

par_4

11

<---

7

-.418

.045

-9.209

***

par_1

11

<---

8

.370

.031

11.930

***

par_5

11

<---

9

.477

.035

13.643

***

par_6

11

<---

12

.344

.034

10.002

***

par_7

 

Standardized Regression Weights: (Group number 1 - Default model)

Estimate

12

<---

7

.780

9

<---

7

.761

8

<---

7

.625

11

<---

7

-.565

11

<---

8

.438

11

<---

9

.603

11

<---

12

.458


You received this message because you are subscribed to a topic in the Google Groups "DataAnalysis" group.
To unsubscribe from this topic, visit https://groups.google.com/d/topic/dataanalysistraining/4svDtwJn1T0/unsubscribe.
To unsubscribe from this group and all its topics, send an email to dataanalysistrai...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/dataanalysistraining/CAAd%3Dc8OSDBuFetzOho5pWbKckBhRkK2qq026hdPqMsvn1f%3DFAg%40mail.gmail.com.

Ravinder Pant

unread,
Nov 16, 2025, 7:00:38 PMNov 16
to dataanalys...@googlegroups.com, Neeraj Kaushik
Respected sir,

Does it mean that in my case 
P value is less than 0.05 then that beta value is relevant?

Sir please guide how to proceed further regarding its interpretation and reporting for the purpose of PhD thesis.

Thank you 
Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages